Contrary to accepted wisdom on the American right, no president

has ever been harder on illegal immigrants that Barack Obama. But

has he been fair? And given the benefits the U.S. has derived from

the undocumented, have its policies ever been fair?



Pirates, Puritans and U.S. Immigration (La Jornada, Mexico)


“Day after day, the press, radio, and above all, television, in this quintessential nation of immigrants, have managed to turn the majority into furious anti-immigrants. ... U.S. culture is torn between the spirit of the pirate and the Puritan soul. That is how the nation was forged, with a dual morality that allows one to take advantage of cheap labor, while simultaneously condemning it as illegal.”


By Dr. Jorge Durand*



Translated By Douglas Myles Rasmussen


June 3, 2012


Mexico – La Jornada – Original Article (Spanish)

The U.S. Border Patrol: The 396,906 illegal immigrants deported in fiscal year 2011 was the highest annual number in U.S. history.


AL-JAZEERA, QATAR: Children caught in the middle of US deportation case, Feb. 21, 00:02:21RealVideo

The question of immigration in the United States is of vital importance. It demands a political solution. But that road is closed, because the media have exploited the issue and polarized the public. This is put the issue into the domain of morality and legality, where there are no concessions, and many politicians have exploited it to get themselves elected.


For the mass media giants, immigration is a hot-button issue that must be reported on and that everyone must express an opinion about. One supposedly liberal network, CNN, had as its star pundit Lou Dobbs, the most insidious and pernicious of commentators, who freely dispensed his views on “illegal” immigrants and ridiculed politicians who dared speak in their favor. In the end he was fired after a campaign launched by a university professor, massively supported on social networks and by the Latino public. CNN’s Spanish-language channel took the liberty of not broadcasting Dobbs’ and instead turned to Carmen Aristegui. The double-speak finally ended.

Posted by Worldmeets.US


Day after day, the press, radio, and above all, television, in this quintessential nation of immigrants, have managed to turn the majority into furious anti-immigrants. The rest have learned to shut up. The Republicans claim they are “true conservatives,” but no liberal dares say that he’s a liberal and proud of it.


The result has been the polarization on the issue of immigration among the U.S. public, as many believe that what is said on TV must be true. The Manichean position goes so far as to deny an obvious reality: no one complains about having cheap lettuce in the supermarket, but the majority considers those who pick it to be illegal invaders.


On this topic, Nobel laureate John Steinbeck, originally from Salinas, California and author of The Winter of Our Discontent, wrote that U.S. culture is torn between the spirit of the pirate and the Puritan soul. That is how the nation was forged, with a dual morality that allows one to take advantage of cheap labor, while simultaneously condemning it as illegal.


This double standard became law in 1952, when the so-called Texas Proviso was enacted. This condemned undocumented workers but explicitly exonerated the employers that hired them. Hypocrisy has been part and parcel of U.S. immigration policy. The current Immigration Reform and Control Act, which replaced the Texas Proviso, calls for sanctions against those who hire undocumented workers, but in practice none are enforced. Instead, penalties are levied against immigrants who are rejected by the new labor verification system known as E-Verify [Employment Eligibility Verification]. Nobody talks about fines against employers, wheras the hammer falls swiftly when a worker has to demonstrate his or her legal status.


[Editor’s Note: In 1951, the President's Commission on Migratory Labor recommended that employers be prohibited from hiring illegal aliens, a prohibition we now refer to as employer sanctions. But instead of prohibiting the hiring of illegal aliens, Congress inserted the Texas Proviso into the 1952 Immigration and Nationalization Act, which specifically permitted the employment of illegal immigrants.]


The double standard also appears in the taxes immigrants must pay, but from which they will receive no benefit. The government and Social Security have a special bag of contributions from undocumented workers that has reached $1 trillion. The pirates keep the money and the Puritans accuse of them of not being allowed to work, but they still have to pay taxes.


La Jornada, Mexico: Clueless Border Patrol Uses Intelligence to Study Recidivism
La Jornada, Mexico: Undocumented on Edge Before U.S. Supreme Court Ruling
La Jornada, Mexico: Undocumented are Again Caught in U.S. Power Struggle
Excelsior, Mexico: 'Comprehensive' Mexico-U.S. Integration is the Only Answer
La Jornada, Mexico: NAFTA Should Be Reopened to Protect Mexican Workers

La Jornada, Mexico: Mexicans in the U.S.: A Nation Within a Nation

El Universal, Mexico: Lawmakers Condemn Arizona's 'Racist' Anti-Immigrant Law

Diario Co Latino, El Salvador: Europe and U.S. Equally Cruel to Migrant Workers

El Periodico, Guatemala: Obama is Right: U.S. People Need Spanish Lessons!
El País, Spain: Tea Party 'Endangers Health' of American Democracy

Estadão, Brazil: The Massacre in Arizona: Will America Ever Learn?

News, Switzerland: The Day Hope Was Shot, in America and Europe

Der Spiegel, Germany: Blaming Sarah Palin for Tucson Attack is 'Wrong'

Rheinische Post, Germany: America's 'Intellectual Instigators' of Hatred

Berliner Morgenpost: Mutual Respect: What U.S. Owes Itself, World

Polityka, Poland: America in Anger's Clutches

Salzburger Nachrichten, Austria: Massacre in Tucson: 'A Sad Day for U.S.

Guardian, U.K.: Arizona Shootings: Left, Right at Odds Over Effects of Toxic Politics

TLZ, Germany: America's Hate-Filled Rhetoric 'Unworthy of a Democratic Nation'  



Finally, migration has entered the electoral campaign, as it is a federal and not a state issue. However, in 1996, a law enacted by liberal Democrat Bill Clinton allowed legislation at the state level on social policy and whether or not local jurisdictions support immigrants. This gave rise to Arizona law SB-1070 and several thousand other anti-immigrant propositions.


Beginning with the Clinton-enacted law, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, local conservative politicians have found the immigration debate of use in their electoral campaigns. But oftentimes behind those accusing migrants of being “illegal” hide the nativists, racists, fascists and xenophobes who advocate “English Only” policies and White supremacy. All boast about being defenders of legality, thereby justifying their intransigence.


The politicization of the immigration issue, debated with Puritanical moral arguments and proclaimed far and wide by the media, has shut the road to any kind of immigration reform. Politics is the science of “making what is necessary possible.” It is urgent, not just necessary, to take these 11 million people out of the shadows, who only claim their right to work, integrate and participate - with full rights – in the society they live and work in.


There are immigrants who have, for more than 20 years, been honestly living and working in the United States. But one car accident, one broken taillight or one intransigent police officer empowered by legal agreements with ICE [U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement] can throw away an entire life. No matter that they have three children who are U.S. citizens, nor that the family is fundamental to society. The immigrant has sinned, he is illegal. One can exploit him, but not forgive him.


*Dr. Jorge Durand is an anthropologist and researcher at the University of Guadalajara’s Department for the Study of Social Movements.




opinions powered by
blog comments powered by Disqus























































[Posted by Worldmeets.US June 9, 1:59am]


Live Support