[International Herald Tribune, France]

 

 

Gazeta Wyborcza, Poland

Quietly and Successfully, the White House Tightens Noose Around Tehran

 

"The administration of President Obama, without desisting from attempts to convince Moscow and Beijing of the necessity of new sanctions, has opened another front in the Cold War with Iran: they have explained to multinational corporations that they can either do business with America or do it with Iran."

 

By Mariusz Zawadzki

 

Translated By Halszka Czarnocka

 

April 2, 2010

 

Gazeta Wyborcza - Poland - Original Article (Polish)

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad addresses a crown in Orumiyeh, Iran: Is renewed pressure on Iran a result of President Obama's inexperience?

 

BBC NEWS VIDEO: Former chief of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, rejects new Iran sanctions as innefective, Apr. 9, 00:01:35RealVideo

The Americans are encircling Iran. One by one, they are forcing multinational corporations not to trade with Tehran. The new strategy has already brought better results than U.N. sanctions.

 

For seven years, Washington has tried unsuccessfully to bring a halt to the Iranian nuclear program by pushing for sanctions in the U.N. Security Council. After months of painstaking negotiations, they are usually adopted but are only symbolic and devoid of teeth.

The watering down of the sanctions is due to pressure from Russia and China, two permanent Security Council members that have veto power and which have their own interests with Iran. The Russians are building a nuclear power plant there and sell Iran weapons, while the Chinese are buying Iranian oil and are in the business of exploiting Iranian oil and gas fields.

 

For these reasons, the administration of President Barack Obama, without desisting from attempts to convince Moscow and Beijing of the necessity of new sanctions, has opened another front in the Cold War with Iran. For months, it has been patiently and quietly talking to international corporations. The Americans have a strong argument in hand: during the last decade, companies doing business with Tehran received U.S. government contracts and tax rebates worth a total of $108 billion. Now U.S. officials have explained to them that they must make a choice - either do business with America or do it with Iran. As one might expect, the companies usually choose the former.

 

A week ago Leonid Fedun, vice president of the Russian oil giant Lukoil, announced, “We're withdrawing from the project to exploit the oil fields in Anaran, Iran. We can't continue because of the threat of American sanctions.”

 

That same day, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev said that, “sanctions against Iran aren't the best option.” But Lukoil wants to build a huge refinery in the U.S., where it has, along with Conoco Phillips, a chain of 1,600 gas stations.

 

Lukoil is just the latest corporation to cave under American pressure. Washington is specifically targeting companies that sell gasoline to Iran. Although Iran has the third largest oil reserves in the world, its outdated refineries are unable to turn it into gasoline. As a result, Tehran has to import 40 percent of the gasoline consumed by the country. The analysts agree - this is the most vulnerable point of the regime of the ayatollahs.

 

Last December, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that would impose penalties on companies that sell gasoline to Iran. It isn't yet law, because the Senate introduced amendments and now both chambers have to agree on a common version, which is reportedly delayed due to the pressure from the White House.

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

The Obama Administration is hesitating because the proposed law has allies protesting. In a letter to the White House, the E.U. High Representative for Foreign Affairs Catherine Ashton criticized the bill: “We are deeply concerned about the bill, which imposes an American law on other countries, which is contrary to earlier agreements between the U.S. and the E.U.”

 

The U.S. penalties, although not yet law, are already causing a panic. In early March, the world’s largest fuel trader, Vitol (a group based in Switzerland), said that beginning next January 1, it will not sign any new contracts with Iran, and that current gasoline shipments were just to fulfill earlier agreements.

 

In parallel, Royal Dutch Shell issues a similar announcement, while the Financial Times wrote that other fuel resellers - the third largest fuel trader, Holland-based Trafigura, and Swiss Glencore - are also abstaining from selling gasoline to Iran. Moreover, the disease is spreading to other sectors of the economy; in March Ingersoll-Rand, an international manufacturer of compressors and cooling systems terminated its cooperation with Iran, and ordered its daughter companies to do the same. “We're leaving the Tehran game until the regime changes,” said a company spokesman.

 

Experts believe that Iran will always find someone to sell it gasoline, for example on Asian markets. But it will have to pay more to smaller contractors. Among the potentates of the global feul supply, only French Total, Malaysian Petronas and Kuwait’s IPG - the last one supplying 25 percent of Iran’s gas imports - still provide gasoline to Iran.

 

 

SEE ALSO ON THIS:

Gazeta Wyborcza, Poland: START Will Do Nothing to Prevent the Inevitable

Kayhan, Iran: Ahmadinejad Warns 'Inexperienced' Obama

Kitabat, Iraq: U.S. Withdrawal Seals Iraq's 'Certificate of Death'  

Kitabat, Iraq: Curse of U.S. or Curse of Iran: Iraqi Voters Must Choose

 

Bookmark and Share

 

The Tehran authorities have already begun to feel the bite of these gasoline sanctions. On March 21, the government lowered the monthly allotment of cheap, subsidized gas from 80 liters [21 gallons] to 60 [15 gallons] (a liter costs about 10 cents). Once they hit the limit, drivers must buy fuel at 4 times the price, which of course is still heavily subsidized by the state.  

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

The Iranian parliament has prepared a plan for gradual elimination of subsidies for gas, food and electricity, which cost the country tens of billions dollars per year. This is essential if the inefficient Iranian economy is to stand on its own; on the other hand, it is extremely risky for the regime. Tightening the noose of sanctions, the Americans hope to bring the ayatollahs to make concessions, or even - in the extreme case- to contribute to their downfall.

 

Since July 2009, when hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won a presidential election considered rigged by the opposition, Iran has been restless. Dozens of people were killed when police opened fire on street demonstrations. It's hard to imagine what will happen when Iranians, already complaining about their lack of freedom, become aware that they also have to endure drastic price hikes.

 

CLICK HERE FOR POLISH VERSION

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US April 10, 6:50pm]

 







Bookmark and Share