Globe & Mail, Canada

[Click Here For More Cartoons]



China Must 'Strive to Influence' American Presidential Elections (Huanqiu, People's Republic of China)


With all of the criticism directed at Beijing by both President Obama and his Republican challenger Mitt Romney, is it time for China's authorities to 'stop sitting submissively' and adopt an attitude of 'intervention' in the U.S. presidential campaign? According to this editorial from state-run Huanqiu, directly challenging the insults and constantly-repeated anti-China 'lies' uttered by the candidates is necessary for the prevention greater Sino-U.S. hostility.




Translated By Casey Patrick Reilly


September 29, 2012


People’s Republic of China – Huanqiu – Original Article (Chinese)

The U.S. presidential campaign is fully engaged, and Romney and Obama appear to be competing to see who can act tougher toward China. Romney took the lead by bellowing that, “on the very first day of my term,” he would punish the Chinese people. So as not to appear weak and to compete with Romney for votes, just days ago, Obama launched a WTO complaint against China’s auto industry.


U.S. presidential elections always bring China misfortune, and the plot of this story is already an old cliché. But this year, Romney and Obama seem to want to take it to another level. America’s chronic unemployment "psoriasis" is being unreasonably blamed on China, and China’s economy is being called a vampire coiled around America’s rice bowl. Trade friction between China and the U.S. are being aggravated thanks to this election, and mutual suspicion is very likely to deepen.




Like Worldmeets.US on Facebook


Chinese people are supposed to have such big hearts, that they can tolerate and even accustom themselves to having one bucket of dirty water after another spilled over them during U.S. elections. In this respect, participants in American elections have become ever-more wanton, completely disregarding the feelings of the Chinese people who must listen to this abuse and vilification. The Americans have been somewhat spoiled by China’s reticence.


Regardless of whether it is the incumbent or his challenger, China should not tolerate the unrestrained way American candidates take us for fools, especially in the final sprint of a U.S. presidential campaign. Both should maintain at least a modicum of respect for China. They should take more care when they speak, and not shoot their mouths off.


Many of the things Romney says about China resemble what comes out of the mouths of angry young men on the Internet, and seem to lack any genuineness. If after the election, Romney were to truly espouse the ideas he is expressing, he would be an extreme nationalist president regarding Sino-U.S. trade, and would trigger unmitigated upheaval. In light of the sickly, weakened state of the U.S. economy, this kind of “kill 1,000 enemies, lose 800 of your own” trade war is not something America can afford.




Xinjingbao, China: On Trade, China Must Target Conservative U.S. Democrats

Global Times, ChinaAmerican Politicians to Stick with China-Bashing Hypocrisy

Beijing Times, China: Elections Can't Cure America's 'Disease'
Global Times, China: China the Universal Scapegoat in America's 'Ugly' Midterm Polls

Telegraph, U.K. New Video 'Could Kill' Mitt Romney's Chances of Becoming President
Independent, U.K.: Obama's Foreign Policy of Reconciliation in 'Tatters'
Global Times, China: America is 'Disrespectful' of Other Cultures


This extremist setting-up of China as an election target is part and parcel of the deceitful tricks and irresponsibility rapidly accumulating throughout the U.S. presidential campaign, and has now become an "obsession." We know from experience that for the most part, malicious words that target China during U.S. presidential elections are rarely acted upon, but the things being said now and broadcast in political ads undoubtedly fan the flames of Chinese resentment.


We don’t know whether or not to simply treat the way Romney and Obama keep raising the stakes with China as a circus show. Perhaps we should not, because the excesses of their speeches are misleading to the American people. The more a lie is repeated, the more it seems true. Americans will have increasingly more complaints that will sooner or later turn to hatred, which will stimulate confrontational emotions toward America within Chinese society.


With mutual discontent between the U.S. and China building, who would be foolish enough to treat such improper and malicious words uttered during an American presidential election as a game? Many intractable international conflicts have begun with the bravado of politicians.

Posted by Worldmeets.US


Since it is now so deeply interwoven into the U.S. presidential campaign, China should never again place itself in the position of ordinary onlooker. We should raise our voice with an unmistakable attitude of “intervention” in the U.S. campaign, correcting the words and deeds of the candidates and the way the American public perceives China.



U.S. presidential elections should not continue as a stage for the casual demonization of China. At the very least, they should be a place for competing attitudes toward it. Since the U.S. elections bring such a focus on China, we should strive to influence the direction and content of that attention.


This will certainly not be easy, but it is not impossible. It just requires us to stop sitting submissively, and stop grinning and bearing whatever insults are hurled our way by the two candidates.


These are the recent China-related assertions of the two candidates:

On Sept. 17, the president announced that his administration will launch a WTO enforcement action against China's government for illegally subidizing car and car part manufacturers. This is likely a move to appeal to Ohio voters, where 1 in 8 jobs is tied directly or indirectly to auto manufacturing. Yesterday, the administration barred a Chinese-held firm from owning or building four wind projects. Security officials considered the site uncomfortably close to a Navy facility in Oregon. The AP says that this was the first time in 22 years that a U.S. president has blocked such a foreign business deal. And over the past 48 hours, the Obama campaign has been critizing Romney for having so much money invested in China.



MITT ROMNEY: Mitt Romney accuses President Obama of being, "China’s doormat at the expense of America’s workers." He accused the president of not standing up to China and not labeling Beijing a "currency manipulator." Beijing refuses to allow its currency, the yuan, to appreciate to something approaching its real market value. According to 2012, Mitt Romney promises to issue five executive orders his first day in office, The fourth is, "An order to sanction China for unfair trade practices: The Treasury Department would list China as a currency manipulator; the Commerce Department will assess countervailing duties on Chinese imports; An order to empower American businesses and workers.



News, Switzerland: Obama Bad; Romney Worse

FTD, Germany: 'Germans Cannot Grasp Why People would Vote Romney'

Rceczpospolita, Poland: Romney is the Better Choice for Poland
Izvestia, Russia: Obama: 'Not a God, But a Partner'

Telegraph, U.K. New Video 'Could Kill' Mitt Romney's Chances of Becoming President
Independent, U.K.: Obama's Foreign Policy of Reconciliation in 'Tatters'
Global Times, China: America is 'Disrespectful' of Other Cultures

MacLeans, Canada: Behind Mitt Romney's Response to Killings at Consulate in Libya
Die Zeit, Germany: Romney's 'Nostalgia' is Ill-Suited to a Fast-Changing World
Die Tageszeitung, Germany: Muslim Unrest Raises Stakes of U.S. Election Even Higher
Le Figaro, France: U.S. Democrats in Combat Mode; Face Unemployment Headwind

La Repubblica, Italy: The Right to Vote Being Imperilled in America!
Al Mesryoon, Egypt: Romney: Can Such a 'Vacuous Figure' Lead the Strongest Nation?

Rzeczpospolita, Poland: Election in America: Romney Gives Poland an Opening
Neviditelny Pes, Czech Republic: If Romney Wins, He Can Keep His Radar!

China Daily, China: America's Unsettling Political 'Hate Speech'

Guardian, U.K.: Paul Ryan Sets Up Romney Stall but No One is Buying

Guardian, U.K.: Democratic National Convention 2012 - Live Coverage

News, Switzerland: 'Legitimately Raped': An Idea the Iran Regime Could Love

News, Switzerland: Cows, Pigs, Women and American Conservatives

News, Switzerland: Ryan: Romney's Libertarian Trojan Horse May Bolt

Globe & Mail, Canada: History Does Not Bode Well for GOP's New Pick
Die Zeit, Germany: Ex-Mormon Missionary Romney's Europe Gaffes Were Calculated

The Observer, U.K.: In Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney Makes Risky and Divisive Choice

Economist, U.K.: Romney Makes his Choice

Le Figaro, France: Why the U.S. Presidential Campaign Has Gone to the Dogs
Amal al-Oumma, Egypt: Egyptians Can Learn from American Presidential Race

Le Figaro, France: Ann Romney and Michelle Obama: The Battle for FLOTUS Begins

Economist, U.K.: Romney's 'Fake' Woman Problem

Gazeta, Russia: ‘Hysteria’ over Romney’s ‘Flattery’ of Russian Influence

Le Monde, France: The Misery of the 'Electoral Circus'

Le Figaro, France: Lunatic Fringe Runs Romney’s Nomination Campaign

News, Switzerland: Study Reveals that Facts Don't Matter to U.S. Conservatives
San-in Chuo Shimpo, Japan: World Hopes Republican Spat Improves Policies
Le Figaro, France: America’s ‘Right’ Makes the French Right Seem ‘Left’
News, Switzerland: Rick ‘Ahmadinejad’ Santorum
Hindustan Times, India: Santorum: 'Prince of Sanctimony'
Jeune Afrique, Senegal: 'Oddball Extremist' Santorum Could Make Obama's Day
NRC Handelsblad, The Netherlands: Santorum Wrong on Euthanasia in Netherlands
Jornal De Negotios, Portugal: Taxes: Warren Buffett, His Secretary, and the Grocer
Gazeta, Russia: America's Young People Turn Against 'Patriotic Bravado'
Le Figaro, France: Gingrich Success Reflects Republican 'Personality Disorder'
Tokushima Shimbun, Japan: State of Union Sends 'Wrong Message' to Pyongyang
Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Germany: America: 'Land of Inequality'
Liberation, France: It is 'Yes We Can' in America Once More
Liberation, France: Finally, Obama Chooses Combat Over Conciliation
FAZ, Germany: U.S. Republican 'Civil War' Proving Hopelessly Divisive
Der Tagesspiegel, Germany: The Republicans: Right Where Obama Wants Them
Nachrichten, Austria: Newt: America's 'Hypocritical Moralizing Apostle'
Diario de Cuyo, Argentina: Chavez and Obama: A Common Electoral Challenge
China Daily, China: Republican Race 'Hijacks' China-U.S. Relations
Diario de Cuyo, Argentina: Chavez and Obama: A Common Electoral Challenge
News, Switzerland: Romney's Core Presidential Competency: 'Shameless Lying'
Samidoon, Palestinian Territories: 'Thank You Newt: Your Insolence is Required!'
Le Quotidien d’Oran, Algeria: Gingrich's 'Fervent' Wish: 'Final Solution' for Palestinians
FTD, Germany: U.S. Republicans Must Expunge 'Radicalism' and Choose Romney
Komsomolskaya Pravda, Russia: Putin is Better than Goldman Sachs
Liberation, France: Democracy Crippled: Economics Replaces Separation of Powers
El Pais, Spain: Occupy Wall Street: Will it Help or Hinder Reelection of Obama?





blog comments powered by Disqus



















































[Posted by Worldmeets.US Sept. 29, 2:29am]


Bookmark and Share