Roman Polanski: Is it time to let bygones be bygones?

 

 

Le Temps, Switzerland

Swiss Decision on Polanski 'Courageous and Respectable'

 

"The record of the case shows the possibility that the extradition request was seriously flawed, and that in fact, Roman Polanski had already served the sentence for which he had been convicted. That Switzerland couldn't get a California court to provide a sensitive document likely favorable to Polanski confirms this suspicion. ... Swiss rule of law - that all citizens are equal under the law - was wrongly invoked to justify his arrest."

 

By Francois Modoux

 

Translated By Philippe Guittard

 

July 12, 2010

 

Switzerland - Le Temps - Original Article (French)

 

Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf, Swiss justice minister and member of that country's Executive, the Federal Council: After deciding to detain Roman Polanski last year, she has now decided to release him, after California legal authorities refused to hand over key documents in the case.

 

BBC NEWS VIDEO: The Swiss reject American request to extradite Roman Polanski, July 12, 00:01:56RealVideo

As the months have gone by, the decision not to extradite Roman Polanski has been ripening. The verdict, just announced by Federal Councilor Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf, is courageous. It will shock some in the Swiss public who will see in this, a bit too quickly, special treatment by Switzerland for an artist who was been found guilty of a serious crime and has evaded justice. But this is too narrow a way to approach the Polanski case. And it's a relief to learn that at the highest levels, the complexity of the case and Swiss responsibility for the misadventure that has befallen the filmmaker was recognized.

 

If the Federal Department of Justice was free to decide without reference to our ministers, the decision would likely have gone the other way. Analyzed at the legal and administrative level, the U.S. demand to extradite Polanski should have been accepted. But to consider an extradition request a simple administrative matter is a legal blunder. As former Federal Councilor Elisabeth Kopp noted on her blog a few months ago, an extradition request is a special case, and Swiss political authorities still have some room to maneuver. If extradition procedures are governed by treaties that establish rules for judicial cooperation, the decision to approve such a request is a sovereign act that much be carefully weighed.

 

The record of the case shows the possibility that the extradition request was seriously flawed, and that in fact, Roman Polanski had already served the sentence for which he had been convicted. That Switzerland couldn't get a California court to provide a sensitive document likely favorable to Polanski confirms this suspicion. This was compounded by the fact that the rape victim behind the case against the artist, has said several times that she has forgiven him and no longer wants to hear this story going back over 30 years. No federal councilor could ignore these facts when considering a request to extradite the filmmaker.    

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

The very circumstances surrounding Roman Polanski's arrest were heavily in his favor. The filmmaker was arrested upon arrival in Zurich, after he was invited by Swiss authorities to receive an award. This was to be a senior federal official who was to praise him - on behalf of Switzerland. Polanski's confidence in Switzerland was badly betrayed by the zeal of an official who himself reported to U.S. authorities the moment the director arrived on Swiss soil. This - despite the fact that Polanski regularly stayed in Switzerland at a cottage he owns - and without anyone questioning or worrying about it. Swiss rule of law - that all citizens are equal under the law - was wrongly invoked to justify Polanski's arrest. Or else, how can we justify the way this principle was never brandished to trigger Polanski's arrest during his frequent trips to Gstaad?

 

SEE ALSO ON THIS:    

Department of Justice, Switzerland: Swiss Reject U.S. Extradition of Polanski  

Nachrichten, Switzerland: Polanski: Switzerland's Diplomatic Car Wreck

Gazeta Wyborcza, Poland: Roman Polanski: 'Let's Burn This Witch'    

Le Temps, Switzerland: Swiss 'Not in America's Pocket'; 'Proud' of Polanski Arrest    

Le Figaro, France: Extraditing Polanski: What Ever Happened to Swiss Neutrality?  

Le Temps, Switzerland: After UBS Debacle, Polanski Affair a New Black Eye for Swiss  

Nachrichten, Switzerland: Is Switzerland the 51st State?  

Der Spiegel, Germany: Victim or Perpetrator? The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski

Krakow Post , Poland: Poles Hold Rally to Defend Filmmaker Roman Polanski

The Times, U.K.: France Appeals to Hillary on Behalf of Roman Polanski  

Financial Times: Nicolas Sarkozy Wants 'Resolution' to Polanski Arrest  

The Telegraph U.K.: Polanski's 'Victim' Wants Charges Dropped

The Telegraph U.K.: Roman Polanski's Wikipedia Page Frozen After 'Editing War'  

 

Bookmark and Share

 

In the end, Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf was convinced that Switzerland was taking no great risk by vetoing this American demand. The refusal to extradite Polanski's is not a slap at Washington, but at California court and legal officials who, to push their own campaigns for higher office, sought to use Polanski to their own advantage after a Swiss official handed them the chance. The American government has rightly welcomed Switzerland's remarkable cooperation when it comes to welcoming two former Guantanamo detainees - both Uyghurs. Even hostile pressure from China didn't shake Swiss support for the Obama Administration. On this delicate issue, Switzerland has proven its reliability. Washington won't want to sacrifice such cooperation from Bern to see Roman Polanski on American soil with his wrists in handcuffs.

 

CLICK HERE FOR FRENCH VERSION

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US July 12, 5:07pm]

 

 







Bookmark and Share