False Flag in Syria: Action Only Hitler Could Admire! (Argumenty i Facty, Russia)
"All of these damned lies, all of these innocent victims,
are required to achieve a singular purpose - to alter an objectionable
political regime. The motto, ascribed to the Jesuits, 'the end justifies the
means,' is today emblazoned on the flags of Western democrats. ... After all of
this, words about human rights passing through the lips of these politicians
are as absurd as Adolf Hitler's pronouncements on world peace after Poland was
invaded in September 1939."
Any
remaining illusions held by some, about the lofty humanitarian ideals of America
and the other countries in the so-called "civilized world" before
the Arab spring, have now been completely dispelled. Drowned
in blood, Libya and Syria are prime examples.
The
regimes that once existed in these countries were much more tolerant than those in
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, or Bahrain, which are never questioned by devotees of spreading
human rights with the help of Tomahawk missiles.
But
after the overthrow and brutal murder of Qaddafi, without trial or
investigation, Libya became an open wound, and the lives of its citizens now resemble
a real-life hell. In that county, central authority is virtually absent, and citizens
have become hostages of a never-ending struggle among various warlords. The
number of ordinary, peace-loving civilians who have perished in this bloody hurricane
is impossible to count.
And
all of this, in reality, was just for the sake of replacing Qaddafi, who was
not sufficiently loyal to the West, with a figure more pleasing to Anglo-Saxon designs.
Now
that situation is repeating itself in Syria. It must be clearly understood that
the people there are not being killed by international terrorists, but by
respectable diplomats from the U.S. State Department and the foreign ministries
of Great Britain and France.
That
is because these polished gentlemen could care less how many non-combatants are
killed in this cauldron of civil conflict; the only thing of importance is that
Bashar Assad be replaced by someone more loyal to the Western powers.
The
latest story accusing Syrian government forces of using chemical weapons on
civilians in a suburb of Damascus is typical. Despite the best efforts of the opposition,
President Assad isn't going away. Moreover, the last few months of the conflict
demonstrate that despite the many challenges, Syrian authorities are capable of
not only resisting the militant onslaught, but of defeating them.
It
has become clear that the opposition is incapable of bringing a change of power
in Damascus without outside military intervention, and that a more-or-less
justified military intervention is only possible if the Syrian authorities use chemical
weapons.
What
is also clear is that Assad would only be moved to do so in the event of utter desperation
- if it became clear that he is doomed. However, as stated above, the situation
attests to the opposite - and that the Syrian opposition alone has reason to
despair.
So
at a time in which the country is being visited by U.N. representatives, in a
suburb of Damascus, a sudden chemical attack with hundreds of victims takes
place.
This
attack is obviously not advantageous to Assad, and is clearly beneficial to the
opposition. The classic postulate of detectives is "look for who stands to
benefit." In this situation, any
reasonable person would have to conclude that the Syrian opposition is under
grave suspicion.
Posted By
Worldmeets.US
But
in Western countries, the diplomatic corps is evidently not present in the reasonable
people camp. It belongs to the executive camp, which is why it now publicly
asserts that there is no doubt about the culpability of government forces, which
supplies a pretext for military intervention.
The
military forces of the United States and its satellite countries have begun to congregate
along Syrian shores, ready to plunge the country into irreparable chaos,
extirpate tens of thousands of civilians, and condemn the survivors to penury
and lawlessness. That is, to lead Syrians down the "path of Libya."
All
of these damned lies, all of these innocent victims, are required to achieve a singular
purpose - to alter an objectionable political regime. The motto, ascribed to
the Jesuits, "the end justifies the means," is today emblazoned on
the flags of Western democrats.
After
all of this, words about human rights passing through the lips of these politicians
are as absurd as Adolf Hitler's pronouncements on world peace after Poland was
invaded in September 1939.
However,
that same Hitler, while slaughtering millions of Soviet citizens, also claimed to
be bringing them liberation from the yoke of Hebe-Bolshevism [Jewish-Bolshevism]
Based
on these similarities, fans of Barack Obama, David Cameron, and Francois Hollande
should greet their idols with hand salutes and shouts of "Sieg Heil!"
- because thanks to their actions, they have truly earned it.
*Andrei
Sidorchik is editor of the Society section of the Internet service A&F.
