In United States politics, there are two emblematic animals: the elephant and the donkey

Semana, Colombia

Obama Win Could Cost Colombia Dearly

 

"Like no other government in the world, Uribe and his cohorts pulled out all the stops to support the Republican campaign. … It now has no choice but to attempt to redeem itself with 'That One' (as John McCain once referred to Obama) and his party."

 

By Nelson Camilo Sánchez

http://worldmeets.us/images/nelsoncamilosanchez_semanamug.jpg

Translated By Liz Essary

 

November 14, 2008

 

Colombia - Semana - Original Article (Spanish)

http://i.usatoday.net/news/_photos/2008/07/02/mccain-planex.jpg

Senator McCain speaks in Cartagena, Colombia, July 3.

 

BBC NEWS VIDEO: John McCain tours Latin America, July 3, 00:01:59RealVideo

There are two symbolic animals in United States politics: The elephant and the donkey. The first is the symbol of the Republican Party, the party of Bush and candidate McCain. The second is the mascot of the Democratic Party. The history of the donkey goes back to 1828 when opponents of Andrew Jackson  tried to label him an “ass” because of his veneer of populism. But Jackson took things one step further than his critics, using the animal on his campaign posters.

 

While the entire planet celebrates the victory of the donkey, members of the Colombian government must be regretting months of snubbing the party of Platero’s kin [a Platero is a small donkey http://worldmeets.us/imagesui/readiconmini.gif]. Like no other government in the world, [Colombian President Alvaro] Uribe and his cohorts pulled out all the stops to support the Republican campaign. Perhaps the only thing missing was for them to wear McCain-Palin ’08 lapel pins, because they did everything else: A presidential reception, a tour of Cartagena, compliments here, flattery there http://worldmeets.us/imagesui/readiconmini.gif. … Now, after the people of the United States have come out en masse to punish with their votes the path of disgrace that Republicans have led that country and the world down for the past eight years, Uribe’s government has no choice but to attempt to redeem itself with “That One” (as John McCain once referred to Obama) and his party.

 

http://worldmeets.us/images/mccainvisit_elespectador.gif

'Visit By McCain'                                                [El Espectador, Colombia]

 

Indeed, once the Bush-Uribe marriage ends, two themes that have obsessed the Uribe government could change: the approval of the Colombia Free Trade Agreement http://worldmeets.us/imagesui/readiconmini.gif and the continuation of Plan Colombia http://worldmeets.us/imagesui/readiconmini.gif. Losing the prize of the free trade agreement is what hurts the government most. Both Obama and spokesmen for his party in Congress have committed to passing the agreement, but only if it meets a standard on certain human rights, especially those relating to the rights of union workers and members of the Afro-Colombian community.

 

Therefore despite the Colombian government’s optimism, it is unlikely that the Democratic Party will budge on these issues and give the green light to the treaty. Statistics help explain the situation. As The New York Times puts it, this is the first time in 40 years (since the government of Lyndon Johnson) that a Democratic president won’t have to occupy his time defending himself against Republican majorities in Congress. In fact, Obama will be the first Democratic president since Jimmy Carter in 1976 to have a substantial Congressional majority that supports his agenda. Even with a timid majority, the Democrats have been able to thwart any kind of agreement - contrary to what Uribe and Bush were seeking - and now that members of this party have the frying pan by the handle, it’s highly unlikely that the picture will change.

 

Senator John McCain, wife Cindy and Senator Joe Lieberman

join Colombia President Uribe on a 'campaign stop', July 3.

 

What can be forecast is greater interest from the United States in whether Colombia is complying with its human rights commitments (as far as the our two-party system and the geostrategic interests of those in power will permit, let's not lie to ourselves). And in this regard, several fishy-smelling issues will receive greater scrutiny from The North: for example, allegations of extrajudicial executions attributed to members of the security forces and the government’s mockery of the rights of victims of the conflict [the decades-long civil war against left-wing rebels]. A lack of action in these issues, now more than before, may produce a hardening in the human rights certification process for Colombia, and more stringent conditions when it comes to disbursing more military aid.  

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

This experience will no doubt remind President Uribe and members of his cabinet that it’s better to saddle up the donkey before attempting to mount. To avoid repeating the same blunder, the government has the alternative of taking Obama’s election not as a tragedy that has altered its plans, but as a political opportunity to correct course and adopt a sincere commitment to human rights matters, among other issues that the new administration will examine under a microscope.

 

CLICK HERE FOR SPANISH VERSION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US November 24, 12:19am]