[Toronto Star, Canada]

 

 

La Jornada, Mexico

Obama 'Bit Off More than He Could Chew'

 

"As the saying goes, you shouldn't bite off more than you can chew. And in Obama's case, the president decided all at once to end the economic crisis (hasn't happened yet), fight the lords of Wall Street (who are winning the game), defeat the Taliban (a task that the great powers have failed to achieve), punish British Petroleum and pass a health care reform law, which sapped his popularity only halfway through his term."

 

By Jorge Camil

 

Translated By Florizul Acosta-Perez

 

October 29, 2010

 

Mexico - La Jornada - Original Article (Spanish)

It's Election Day in America: every seat in the House of representatives, 37 Senate seats and many state houses are up for grabs.

 

BBC NEWS VIDEO: Former British Ambassador to the U.S. Sir Christopher Meyer talks about what the midterm election results could mean for President Obama's chances of re-election, Nov. 2, 00:04:05RealVideo

During his campaign to be the Democratic nominee for the U.S. presidency, Barack Obama was criticized, ironically, for one of his chief virtues: his oratory. The Illinois senator’s gift for words became one of his weaknesses. It was said that behind the candidate's distinguished figure, behind his beautiful words, elegant phrases and unhesitant voice, there was no substance. He was accused of being a loudspeaker that repeated with a statesman’s tone and in a modulated and convincing voice what everyone wanted - what the country and the world needed: move away from the nightmare of George W. Bush, his obsession with weapons of mass destruction and his oil wars to try a new rhetoric of peace and security. It was essential to mitigate the effects of the worst-ever global economic crisis.

 

Obama promised to end the war in Iraq. And although he did it more than a year after taking office, he kept his promise. But before leaving Iraq, true to his belief that the real danger to the United States resides in Afghanistan and the rugged mountains of Tora Bora (cave of Osama bin Laden), Obama fully immersed himself in another armed conflict initiated by Bush. Afghanistan would then become Barack Obama’s war: he with his splendid but implausible Nobel Peace Prize!

 

In the middle of the worst recession since 1929, overwhelmed by the collapse of the housing market and with a cascade of bankruptcies by banks and financial institutions, Obama declared war on Wall Street, the market that had triggered the monumental fraud of subprime mortgages; “garbage mortgages” that were so easily granted and destined to fall hopelessly overdue, after being sold in bulk on all stock markets.

 

Obama launched an attack on the bankers and returned to his heroic speeches, but these fell on deaf ears, since the bankers, rescued with huge sums of taxpayer money, soon returned to their corrupt practice of dividing up billions of dollars in bonuses. So began the slur on the figure of the first African-American president, whose oratory was unable to convince greedy British Petroleum to immediately repair the ecological damage it caused in the Gulf of Mexico.    

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

Nevertheless, as Obama struggled with the economic crisis, against the banks and the generals who were reluctant to abandon Iraq, the recalcitrant Right had, from his first day in office, mounted a battle to the death to prevent his reelection. Bill O’Reilly, advisor to Felipe Calderon Dick Morris, Bush's chief strategist Karl Rove, and Sarah Palin, now a political commentator (all oracles of Fox News), decided that Obama would be a one-term president. We will see the results of that war with the legislative elections on November 2. (All forecasts suggest that many Democratic candidates will be defeated).

 

As the saying goes, you shouldn't bite off more than you can chew. And in Obama's case, the president decided all at once to end the economic crisis (hasn't happened yet), fight the lords of Wall Street (who are winning the game), defeat the Taliban (a task that the great powers have failed to achieve), punish British Petroleum and pass a health care reform law, which sapped his popularity only halfway through his term. As a consequence, the man that seemed so invincible on the day of his election is now struggling to win the midterm elections. He needs a win to carry out his program and lend credibility to his government in in order to launch his re-election bid in 2011.

 

SEE ALSO ON THIS:

News, Switzerland: Obama: Don't Bargain with Your 'Political Assassins'

Le Temps, Switzerland: Cheap Advice for President Obama

Tageblatt, Luxembourg: Prepare for 'Tea Time' in America

El Pais, Spain: As U.S. Exposes its Divisions, China Powers Ahead

Global Times, China: The West is Forming an 'Axis of Evil Ideology'

Hispanidad, Spain: How Spain Can Build its Own Tea Party: Copy Palin

El Universal, Mexico: Immigration Reform: Obama's Ace in the Hole

Le Temps, Switzerland: America's 'Cry of Agony' Through the Tea Party

Izvestia, Russia: Evil Obama and China's Yuan: It's About the Midterms

Liberation, France: Christine O’Donnell at the 'Oral Stage'

Financial Times Deutschland, Germany: West Must Halt Slide Since 9-11

El Mercurio, Spain: The 'Neo-Nazi' Campaign Against President Obama

El Mundo, Spain: Beck and Palin Search for Mythical 'Paradise Lost'

Der Standard, Austria: In Despair Over Democracy - Both America's and Ours

National Post, Canada: U.S. Democracy Suffers 'Death By Talk-Show Host'

La Jornada, Mexico: Beck and the New U.S.-Right: 'Like a Horror Movie'

Iraq News Agency, Iraq: Sarah Palin: The 'Seductress' of the American Election

 

Bookmark and Share

 

It's true that in many ways, the Right has helped undermine Obama’s popularity. But none more than those who began to imply sotto voce that the United States wasn't ready for an African-American leader. Others started to repeat a hackneyed argument that did considerably damage to him during his campaign: the thesis is that his successful experience as a community leader in the slums of Chicago failed to prepare him for assuming the U.S. presidency. That argument is particularly compelling now that U.S. supremacy is being challenged by the emergence of China and the Asian powers. All predictions say sustained economic growth over the next ten years will be in Asia.

 

“Yes we can” (sí se puede) was the refrain that Obama persistently repeated in every speech and that eventually led him to the White House. But since campaigning and governing are two different things, the man who now governs a divided country, beset by economic problems, with a war [in Afghanistan] as unpopular as the Iraq War and another with the Right, he is instead struggling to preserve his Democratic electoral base. He doesn't want to be a one-term president like Jimmy Carter, who became a global statesman after his failure in the White House. And he's too young to retire to a private life.  

 

CLICK HERE FOR SPANISH VERSION

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US November 2, 3:45pm]

 







Bookmark and Share