Brazil President Lula looks on as President
Obama welcomes
Lula’s then chief of staff, Dilma Rousseff, to the
White House.
El Pais, Spain
Brazil’s Rousseff and America’s Obama: An ‘Irresistible Pair’
“A powerful alliance between Brazil and the United States
may be one of the most important geopolitical innovations of our time … these commitments
would be a price worth paying to forge an alliance that can have such enormous
positive impact. ... For Brazilians, this will involve a difficult change: to stop believing that what’s good for the United States is bad for Brazil.”
By Moisés Naím
Translated By Andrea Rouse
November 14, 2010
Spain -
El Pais – Original Article (Spanish)
In June 2003, Brazil’s new president
traveled to Washington to meet George W. Bush. On the eve of that meeting, I
published a column in the Financial Times
in which I urged Bush to be as bold with Brazil as he was still in regard to Iraq.
Only, in the case of Brazil, I asked that instead of seeking regime change in
Brasilia, he should do everything possible to bolster the government of Luiz Inácio
Lula da Silva. Bush should have proposed an offer that Lula couldn’t refuse:
a wide-ranging and generous trade agreement, solid backing for social programs
that the Brazilian leader had promised during his campaign, and he should have made
it clear to global financial markets (which still viewed Lula with suspicion)
that the White House believed in the former union leader and would give him unconditional
support.
I wrote then that such a pact
between the two giants would transform not only Brazil, but the entire region. If
both countries pledged to reduce restrictions on international trade, jointly safeguard
democracy on the continent, and invite neighbors to join this alliance, it
would trigger a positive economic and political revolution in the hemisphere; because
for other countries to be excluded from an agreement of this magnitude would impose
prohibitive costs.
In that column I also recognized
how easy it would be to make fun of my proposal … and my naiveté.
That first meeting between
Lula and Bush was very successful and the conservative American and Labor Party
Brazilian shocked the world with a very cordial beginning. But nothing else
happened. There was no interest from the White House in following through on such
proposals to Brazil. And fortunately, Lula didn’t need Washington to fuel the
tremendous progress his country achieved during his presidency. But seven years
later, my idea is still valid.
A powerful alliance between Brazil
and the United States may be one of the most important geopolitical innovations
of our time - and perhaps the most viable. It isn’t that Brazilian soldiers are
going to die in arbitrary U.S. wars or that Brasilia would abide by the
dictates of Washington. Those times are gone, and the United States can't even rely on the unconditional support of traditional allies like the British
or Canadians.
This is about reaching a
series of “very possible” agreements on key issues that are important for both
countries as well as the rest of the world. From trade relations to climate
change, from financial reform and international trade to nuclear proliferation
or the way the world handles the inevitable dislocation caused by the growing economic
and political might of China, India, and of course, Brazil. It’s obvious that
both countries should make concessions and that for the superpower of the North
and the giant in the South, it won’t be easy to accept some of the other’s conditions.
But that’s the way things work. It’s vital to understand that these commitments
would be a price worth paying to forge an alliance that can have such enormous
positive impact.
SEE ALSO ON THIS:
Folha Brazil:
U.S. Navy Shows That What U.S. Can Do, Brazil Can, Too
Estadao, Brazil:
Rhetoric Triumphs Over Reality in Latin America
El Tiempo, Colombia
What Good is Latin America's New U.S.-Free 'Community'?
Folha, Brazil:
Latin American Unity Cannot Be Dependent on Excluding the U.S.
La Razon, Bolivia:
Latin America Has Excluded the U.S. … So What Now?
La Jornada, Mexico:
Latin America's March Toward 'Autonomy from Imperial Center'
My suggestion, then, is that
Dilma Rousseff, Brazil’s next president, make Barack Obama an offer so
attractive that he can’t afford the luxury of rejecting it. For many reasons,
Obama will be much more receptive to this chance to make history than his
predecessor. For Brazilians, this will involve a difficult change: to stop
believing that what’s good for the United States is bad for Brazil. Sometimes
it is, and the interests of one clash with those of the other; but in many cases
- no. In fact, the areas where there are common interests are more numerous and
important than those where there are, and will remain, irreconcilable differences.
Posted by WORLDMEETS.US
I’m quite familiar with the
list of objections and obstacles to this proposal. And I know that it’s still a
bit naive. But it’s not a bad exercise for the next president of Brazil to
think boldly about how to revolutionize the country’s relationship with the
United States. The potential for progress that such a partnership would unleash
if this naiveté becomes reality is too great for Rousseff not to imagine and
explore. Skepticism can sometimes be more of an obstacle and a constraint than naiveté.
mnaim@elpais.es
CLICK
HERE FOR SPANISH VERSION
[Posted by
WORLDMEETS.US November 19, 1:49pm]