In Bogotá they’re showing a movie titled Frost/Nixon about the famous television interviews with the English TV host David Frost in which ex-president Richard Nixon suddenly confessed in 1977 that he’d told lies in 1974

Former President Richard Nixon and British interviewer

Sir David Frost: The ramifications of that interview and

Nixon's entire career have been a lesson to many world

leaders … a lesson that has not necessarily been in the

public interest.

 

 

Semana, Colombia

Around the World, Politicians Have Learned from Nixon

 

"One could cite many examples of the success politicians from around the world have had by following Richard Nixon's moral teachings, from France to Zimbabwe, from Russia to Cambodia or even Madagascar. … Everyone wanted to be like him, except for his melancholy end. That's why they copied his success, but were careful not to repeat his errors. His success was only this: coming to power through trickery. Meanwhile, his mistakes were three: first, getting caught up in his own lies; second, letting go of power; and third, admitting his guilt."

 

By Antonio Caballero

 

Translated By Liz Essary

 

March 14, 2009

 

Semana - Colombia - Original Article (Spanish)

Frost/Nixon recounts two days of interviews between Sir David Frost and former President Richard M. Nixon. For politicians around the world, the lessons of these interviews and Richard Nixon's career appear to be: Don't get caught, and don't ever admit to wrongdoing.

 

INTERVIEW WITH DAVID FROST: Frost discusses how the Nixon interview came about, Jan. 30, 00:03:00RealVideo

In Bogotá they're showing a film entitled Frost/Nixon about the famous 1977 television interviews of British presenter David Frost and ex-President Richard Nixon, in which Nixon suddenly confessed that he had told lies in 1974. Nothing similar has happened since. Never again has a politician recognized that what he said, announced, told, or promised to do, or assured that he didn't do, wasn't true. No one since has performed a public act of contrition like Nixon's, with the exception, of course, of the abject "self-criticisms" coerced out of some by torture or threats, or purchased with the promise of rewards or legal benefits. Like, say, in the Moscow show trials of Stalin's time or in the "free interpretations" of Colombia's Justice and Peace Law by the high commissioner of peace, Luis Carlos Restrepo. Nixon's confession of his sins, far from doing any good, served to sink him even further in the eyes of his country and the world. And by charging $600,000 for this, it discredited him doubly: As a businessman and as a bad businessman.

 

The movie isn't any good. But it's worth seeing for this lesson in living history, which traces the original interviews exactly as they were done, with that rare moment of truth in which the most famous North American political liar was forced to acknowledge that yes, he was [a liar], and ask for forgiveness in a litany of self criticism like an alcoholic who wants to give up drink:

 

"I let down my friends," Nixon says; "I let down my country, I let down our system of government, I let down the dreams of all those young people who should be getting in to government but they're going to think that it's all too corrupt … I let down the American people, and I have to carry that burden with me for the rest of my life."

 

THE FROST/NIXON INTERVIEWS: A MOMENT OF TRUTH

 

Perhaps "young people" who wanted to dedicate themselves to politics had their dreams sullied by Nixon's bad example. I wonder … back then, how old was some beginner politician like, let us say, [President] Álvaro Uribe Vélez? Twenty-five. He has just been appointed head of government-owned enterprises in Medellín. Maybe that young man's dreams were clouded by Nixon, but it also opened his eyes. Richard Nixon, called Tricky Dick, became a role model to be imitated: Everyone wanted to be like him, except for his melancholy end. That's why they copied his success, but were very careful not to repeat his errors. His success was only this: coming to power through trickery. Meanwhile, his mistakes were three: First, getting caught up in his own lies; second, letting go of power; and third, admitting his guilt.

 

Following this lesson, Bill Clinton, who was threatened like Nixon with impeachment and a Congressional trial to revoke his mandate for motives less serious than Nixon's politically-motivated espionage and legal persecution [of his enemies], refused to resign for the very private sin of adultery. Neither did George W. Bush resign, guilty of even greater misconduct, starting with the electoral fraud that brought him to the White House. Bush outsmarted the cunning Nixon by putting into practice a doctrine Nixon put forth in theory during his interview with Frost:

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

"When the President does it - that means that it is not illegal."

 

One could cite many examples of the success that politicians around the world have had following Richard Nixon's moral teachings, from France to Zimbabwe, from Russia to Cambodia and even Madagascar. But perhaps it's enough to observe what has happened in our modest Colombian environment. President Ernesto Samper [1994-98], for example, never acknowledged his guilt in the mafia financing of his presidential campaign, even after announcing, "I'm here and I'm here to stay," had his judgment precluded by his supporters in Congress. Samper was a good disciple of Nixon - and of Bush - but just a beginner if you compare him to [President] Álvaro Uribe. Yes - Samper "was there," but he stayed only as long as his constitutionally-approved mandate lasted. Even bolder, Uribe is reelected again and again so that illegally, he can remain there forever. The only guarantee is that neither the Congress, the courts, nor anyone else will ever judge him.

 

[Editor's Note: Uribe has been Colombian president since August 2002. In the May 2006 election, he won a second four-year term with 62.2 percent of all cast ballots. He was able to run again after pro-Uribe lawmakers in the House of Representatives and Constitutional Court sanctioned a plan to allow immediate presidential re-election. But after issuing its ruling, the court warned that the clause wasn't valid for unlimited presidential re-election. Uribe needs a new constitutional amendment to run again READ MORE].  

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

DAVID FROST TALKS TO DIRECTOR RON HOWARD ABOUT FROST/NIXON

 

This is something that in their naivety, Argentina's military dictators didn't realize - so today they're in jail. Nor did Chile's Augusto Pinochet, who also ended up a prisoner (for mock health reasons, under house arrest). Nor even the "darling" of Peru, Alberto Fujimori, who never even figured out why he had to leave power, and after a few years in exile, is now being embarrassed by being tried by Peruvian judges with the prospect of being condemned to life in prison.

 

But I don't think we'll ever get to see our Álvaro Uribe come up against these issues of imprudence. Apart from Nixon's teachings, we have this nearby example of Fujimori as a warning to him. And the recommendation of the old refrain: He who move his feet, loses his seat.

 

CLICK HERE FOR SPANISH VERSION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US March 20, 6:47pm]