
Is support for family planning programs that
allow for
abortion the same as promoting the procedure?
Many
people in and out of the United States think it
is, and so
oppose President Obama's policy of allowing
federal funds
to pay for abortion.
Siglo Vientiuno, Guatemala
Will Obama Release 'Avalanche of Dollars' to 'Kill Our Babies?'
"Since Obama has lifted the
ban on federal funding for family planning groups that offer abortion outside
the United States, an avalanche of dollars could come our way … to kill our
babies."
By José Joaquín Camacho

Translated By Halszka
February 15, 2009
Guatemala
- Siglo Vientiuno - Original Article (Spanish)
When
a society accepts abortion … it puts its very existence into question.
Among the good things we have
in Guatemala is a constitutional mandate to defend life from the moment of
conception. The reasons are clear, and yet it is fitting to enumerate several of
them here.
[Editor's Note: Article 3 of
Chapter I in Title II of the Constitution of Guatemala grants the right to life
from the point of conception. This article states that the government
"guarantees and protects human life since its conception, as same as the
integrity and security of the person."]
The most elementary is that
violence against the most innocent, as those still unborn are, is an attack
against the basis of true democracy and the genuine rule of law. One of the
achievements of today's modern society is the recognition that human dignity
does not depend on culture, race, sex, intellectual capacity or age. All human beings
possess equal dignity and deserve the same respect for their fundamental
rights, beginning with the right to life. It is obvious that ensuring the right
to life, and in a manner equal to all, is a duty on which the future of the
humanity depends. When a society allows abortion - child-killing - it is
putting into question its very existence.
Turning to Obama, he also has
his good and extremely bad sides. Gallup
conducted a telephone survey (see Web Gallup) of more than 1,000 North
Americans about the seven biggest decisions Obama has taken so far. The
majority approve of the appointment of special envoys to the East [George
Mitchell and Richard Holbrooke], establishing stricter rules of conduct for
government employees, and limits on the interrogation of detainees. In
contrast, 70 percent of those interviewed disapprove of lifting the federal
funding ban on organizations that promote abortion. Let us not forget that this
affects them [people in the U.S.]
as well: in the United
States - in 2008 alone - 1.3 million
abortions were performed.
The blog Scriptor.org, under
the headline, The Unbearable Superficiality of Obama, comments that his
initial discourse restored hope for humanity to many, because of his sense of
history and religion, his oath-taking on the Bible and his invocation of God's
name. But doubts emerged almost immediately: had he taken the oath in vain? If one
invokes the name of God, one should agree with God on at least three or four
basic issues. But Obama does not.
Is this schizophrenia
personal, religious or political? In any case, says the blog, we are
confronting a very serious issue that affects the entire world - every human
being. Because one of Obama's first decisions was to promote a culture of
death: free abortion and the killing of human embryos for experimentation. And
we must understand what's really behind all this: the undeniable presence of
powerful lobbies (the interests of the pharmaceutical industry in the politics
of birth control in the Third World, of pro-choice abortionists, etc.). That is
who Obama defers to or whose views he shares.
Perhaps the bluntest summary
of the problem comes in the headline from Italy's Corriere della Sera: If
He Says No to Torture He Shouldn't Say No to Unborn Life. The commentary
went on: "If this is one of Obama's first acts as president, I believe,
with all due respect, that the road to disappointment has been a very short
one."
The problem is that these
decisions against life affect us, and do so deeply. Since Obama has lifted the
ban on federal funding for family planning groups that offer abortion outside
the United States, an avalanche of dollars could come our way … to kill our
babies. We must not forget that we are - for the moment - a country dependent
on non-governmental organizations.
CLICK
HERE FOR SPANISH VERSION
[Posted by
WORLDMEETS.US February 23, 5:52pm]