Late triumph of tolerance

Cordoba House: An opportunity for coming together?

 

 

Rheinischer Merkur, Germany

Cordoba House: Let it Be a Belated Triumph of Tolerance

 

"A victory by opponents of the mosque would give the Islamists an opening pitch: they wait to expose the true face of the 'godless West' that they allege is fighting Islam, and use it for their own propaganda purposes. … Just like its namesake, that Spanish city of tolerance during the Middle Ages, this would be the opposite of what the 9-11 attackers intended. Preventing this would allow inhumanity another belated victory."

 

By Matthias Gierth

                                

 

Translated By Carol Goetzky

 

August 19, 2010

 

Germany - Rheinischer Merkur - Original Article (German)

Ziya Gokalp: A Turkish nationalist who wanted to use democracy to entrench Islam, is not an example opponents of the Cordoba House want American Muslims to emulate.  

BBC NEWS AUDIO: Obama's 'mosque dilemma,' Aug. 18, 00:02:49RealVideo

The pioneer of Turkish nationalism, Ziya Gökalp coined the phrase in 1912: “Democracy is only the train we board until we reach our destination. Mosques are our barracks, minarets are our bayonets, domes are our helmets, and the believers are our soldiers.” Protests against the building of mosques occurring almost regularly nowadays in western countries are reflexes precisely against this secular claim to power of Islam, which Muslims have never been able to convincingly repudiate. 

 

It’s no wonder then, that the proposed construction of the Muslim community center “Cordoba House,” in close proximity to Ground Zero, has brought emotions to the boiling point. The symbolism of the site weighs so heavily on America, that even for a sophisticated city like New York where there are already over 200 mosques, this is no casual agenda item. The fact that the building authorities failed to take account of this from the outset and didn’t seek greater public approval beforehand makes this all the more incomprehensible.

 

But the current debate, no matter how heated, shouldn’t result in a permanent strain on the coexistence of different cultures and religions. It requires both sides to exercise self-criticism and self-control. So it’s up to Muslims to acknowledge the protests as a serious warning signal. In the U.S. Muslims largely belong to the upper middle class; are educated and are often wealthy. Despite this, they've been unable to counter the growing skepticism against them. 

 

In fact, in the U.S. and elsewhere, Muslim engagement in government and civil society is often in short supply. There is a lack of vocal protest against the countless inhumanities and acts of terrorism that are committed in the name of Allah, and a lack of public support for allied troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Similarly, criticism is far too rare of the shameful fact that Christians in Islamic countries are prohibited from establishing places of worship and churches. This kind of restraint does nothing to contribute to confidence-building between Muslims and non-Muslims; rather, it promotes an atmosphere of suspicion. 

 

Likewise, Muslims in turn have a right to expect from Christians (as well as from non-believers) that a fundamental differentiation be made between Islam and the perversion of Islam, which includes the crimes of September 11. Islam and terror have as little to do with one another as Christianity and terror. A victory by opponents of the mosque would give the Islamists an opening pitch: they wait to expose the true face of the “godless West” that they allege is fighting Islam, and use it for their own propaganda purposes. 

 

With his initial support for the Cordoba House, President Barack Obama gave due recognition to the religious freedom guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. His sympathy was entirely in line with the attempt of his presidency to reach out to Muslims and the Arab World. The fact that under the pressure of this fall’s upcoming congressional elections prompted Obama to backtrack at the beginning of the week, reveals a weak backbone of an already politically-wounded president. 

 

SEE ALSO ON THIS:

ABC, Spain: Cordoba House: The 'Impossible Mosque'

ABC, Spain: The Mosque Near Ground Zero: A Case of Insensitivity

La Opinion de Zemora, Spain: Cordoba House and 'Hussein of Yankeeland'

Guardian Unlimited, U.K.: The Poison Behind the Ground Zero Mosque Furore

The Telegraph, U.K.: The Depressing Debacle of 'Ground Zero Mosque'

BBC News, U.K.: Mosque Dispute Exposes Obama on Two Sides

 

Bookmark and Share

 

Consequently, courage will have to be demonstrated by others. One advantage of advocates of the Islamic center is that the building permit has already been issued. And despite any reservations they have, New Yorkers seem to have a strong sense that it cannot be the responsibility of politicians to decide when and where people can pray. This debate has already become too much of a campaign issue - not the best situation in which to calm heated tempers. 

 

But so as not to squander the opportunity offered by this project, calm is precisely what is needed: near a site where Christians and Muslims were savagely murdered, a mosque is first and foremost a symbol of respect for life that connects all the Abrahamic religions. If put in place, the name of the center - “Cordoba” - will promote peaceful coexistence. Just like its namesake, that Spanish city of tolerance during the Middle Ages, this would be the opposite of what the September 11th attackers intended. Preventing this would allow inhumanity another belated victory.

 

CLICK HERE FOR GERMAN VERSION

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US, August 20, 4:42pm]

 







Bookmark and Share