The mighty 97,000 ton Nimitz-class USS George Washington, now at

the port of Busan in South Korea. The U.S. and South Korea will hold

air and sea exercises called 'Invincible Spirit' from July 25-28.

 

 

Global Times, People's Republic of China

America and China Taken in By South Korean Media

 

Has recent South Korean media coverage of U.S. military plans in the Yellow Sea forced Washington's hand - and triggered an overreaction in China's media? According to this ironic article from China's state-run Global Times written by what is thought to be a fictitious People's Daily editor, Ding Gang, Chinese media should consider information in other media as a 'calculated ploy' and take care not to become 'beads on someone else's abacus.'

 

By Ding Gang [丁刚], People's Daily Senior Editor*

 

July 21 2010

 

People's Republic of China - Global Times - Original Article (English)

USS George Washington crew members inspect the wreckage of South Korean naval vessel Cheonan, at Second Fleet Naval Command in Pyeongtaek, South Korea, July 22.  

ROK MARINE CORP VIDEO: Recruiting video for the South Korean Marine Corp., April 6, 2007, 00:03:56RealVideo

The long-awaited U.S. aircraft carrier is finally due to arrive in South Korea. According to the American military, the aircraft carrier USS George Washington and three destroyers, all from the Seventh Fleet, were scheduled to arrive in South Korea late yesterday to prepare for joint U.S.-Korea military exercises in the Yellow Sea and Sea of Japan.

 

In the "media war" over whether American aircraft carrier should be sent, think tanks and people involved with diplomacy and the military in South Korea, the U.S. and China have frequently expressed opinions. After being stirred up in the media, the situation continues to boil.

 

This is neither the first time nor is it likely to be the last that a U.S. aircraft carrier is participating in joint military exercises with allies like Japan and South Korea. So is this exercise different just because it's being held in the Yellow Sea?

 

Strangely, South Korean officials made a high-profile announcement about the exercises, after which South Korean media deliberately played it up. Meanwhile, after South Korea disclosed the information, the U.S. remained silent. For 20 days during June, the U.S. failed to confirm the news, despite repeated questions raised by Chinese media.

 

Perhaps the U.S. had already decided to send its aircraft carrier; maybe the draft had to be finalized. Now, although it isn't important whether the decision was made before or after the publicity, the role of South Korean media in this incident is worth pondering.

 

The incident [the holding of joint U.S.-South Korea exercises in the Yellow Sea] became the focus of intense debate, particularly in China, where public opinion turned against the American military and created a difficult situation for the U.S.

 

If Washington hadn't sent an aircraft carrier into the Yellow Sea, U.S. hawks would accuse the White House of appeasing China; meanwhile, sending the carrier risks irritating China.

 

Hot Spot: The Yellow Sea is straddled by

China and the two Koreas.

[Worldatlas.com]

 

SEE ALSO ON THIS:

Global Times, China: War is No Solution in Korea or Anywhere Else

Global Times, China: South Korea Should Rethink Military Drills with the U.S.

Global Times, China: The United States 'Must Pay' for Provoking China

Dong-A Ilbo, South Korea: The Lesson of the Korean War: Always Be Prepared

Korean Central News, North Korea: South Korea Must 'Rise Up' and End U.S. Alliance

Dong-A Ilbo, South Korea: Chinese Daily Warns Japan and S. Korea on U.S. Alliance

Taipei Times, Taiwan: Korean War Saved Taiwan from Chinese Aggression

 

Bookmark and Share

 

Of course, the U.S. has good reason to participate in the exercises. By doing so, it can maintain pressure on North Korea, emphasize America's military presence in the region and conduct training. After all, the situation in the Korean Peninsula remains tense and clashes could break out at any time. But this time, the U.S. seems to somewhat reluctantly have been forced into doing so.

 

Whereas before, America could have demonstrated its power by action without words, it now has to enter the Yellow Sea amid the shouts of South Korean media and strong opposition from China's media. This isn't what the Americans wanted to see.

 

Then why should Koreans seek to heat up this seemingly "conventional" operation? Perhaps, as some experts suggest, South Korea wants to kill two birds with one stone. It can show its toughness after years of relatively soft policies toward North Korea], while ultimately relying on the United States to enhance its strategic position.

 

After the Cheonan incident, tensions on the Korean Peninsula seemed to have gradually subsided. South Korea gained little out of the event, which angered the South Korean public, making the situation more difficult for the Lee Myung-bak Administration. But now that tensions from holding these joint military exercise have begun, the South Korean government is skillfully using media to gain a strategic advantage.

 

Do these military exercises really pose an imminent threat to China? I'm afraid not. If Americans really think they can deter China by sending an aircraft carrier battle group into the Yellow Sea, they badly underestimate China.  

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

Following cues from Korean media, Chinese media has exaggerated the impact of these exercises. But the consequent resentment in China reflects real public feeling. Such opinions cannot be ignored.

 

Northeast Asia is undergoing a period of strategic change. Therefore, precise calculations on how to set the stage for a beneficial future for all countries are required. As for these recent uses of media and public opinion, they should probably be regarded as a calculated ploy.

 

For China's media, it is essential to know how to recognize the motives of others, or else we'll become beads on someone else's abacus.

 

*The author is a senior editor with the People's Daily. dinggang@ globaltimes.com.cn

 

[Editor's Note: According to The Washington Post, the name Ding Gang is frequently assigned to important analyses in the People's Daily … Chinese journalists say they believe it to be a pen name used by senior editors or other party propaganda officials conveying an official point of view. Reporters Without Borders rates China's media as "Situation Very Serious"].

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US July 23, 7:29pm]

 







Bookmark and Share