
[The
Manila Times, The Philippines]
El Tiempo, Colombia
Insults, Irony and
Energy: Populism American Style
"While the scandalous part is the
repeated changes in the positions and posturing of the two candidates, what is
most regrettable is the populist spirit of their electoral proposals. … neither
candidate nor the Congress are acting to find a responsible way of resolving the
energy crisis being experienced by the country."
By Sergio Muñoz Bata

Translated By Barbara Howe
August 5, 2008
Colombia
- El Tiempo - Original Article (Spanish)
Between insulting statements
and condemnations that border on slander, recent electoral activity by the U.S.
presidential candidates has focused on their proposals for energy policy. And while
the scandalous part is the repeated changes in positions and posturing of the
two candidates, what is most regrettable is the populist spirit of their electoral
proposals.
This Monday, for example, Barack
Obama surprised the public by contradicting his earlier statements that he
favors resorting to oil from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserves to try and
lower gas prices.
And that wasn't the only
occasion in which Obama changed his cloak. Last week he announced that he now supports
the limited extraction of oil in areas along the U.S. coast until now preserved
from exploitation. Until this latest amendment, Obama had opposed this type of oil
extraction, arguing that coastal drilling entails a risk to the environment so
great that the nation could not allow it.
McCain, meanwhile, has not distinguished
himself by his consistency. The Arizona senator has also had radical change in
his stance on the subject of increasing coastal drilling. In fact during the
primary elections of 2000 when he competed for the Republican nomination against
George W. Bush, McCain transformed himself into the best advocate of the environmental
cause, emphasizing that that the existing ban on coastal drilling should be
extended.
In recent weeks, however,
McCain has taken up the desperate cause of Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney,
in a very visible campaign to discredit Congress and require it to permit oil
exploration off the coast. The brazen political tint of the Republican campaign
leaves no room for retreat. What's at issue is an attempt to expose the Democratic
majority in both houses of Congress as a gang that is irresponsible and insensitive
to the suffering of captive gasoline consumers.
Obama is correct when he says
that it won't be easy for the next President to resolve the enormous challenge of
reforming the nation's energy policies, “given the financial disaster that we
will inherit from the current administration.”
Posted by WORLDMEETS.US
The irritating
thing, however, is that neither candidate nor the Congress are acting to find a
responsible way of resolving the energy crisis being experienced by the country.
Both candidates know perfectly well that tapping the nation's petroleum reserve
won't solve the problem. With regard to coastal drilling and the oil industry, they
also know that four fifths of the existing oil reserves along the coast are
already open, and that drilling in areas protected by the moratorium would only
marginally effect gas prices, if at all, in no less than 15 years.
Unfortunately, they are also fully
aware of surveys which show that the presidential race becoming increasingly
competitive and that the energy issue is vitally important to the citizenry. In
addition, the high price of gasoline affects the cost of transporting people
and food, which hits voters hard in the wallet. This is how political
opportunism prevents them from seeking an integrated approach to the energy
problem.
Meanwhile, aside from the
irony of their proposals, leaders of both parties in the Senate have agreed to
meet in that serpentine monument to energy waste known as Las Vegas to discuss
a new energy plan for the nation.
CLICK HERE FOR SPANISH
VERSION
[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US August 15, 9:50pm]