French commander HautecloqueRaysz hands the 'key' to forward
operational base at Nijrab, Afghanistan,
to Afghan commander
General Mohammad ZamanWaziri, as French troops make ready
to withdraw by year's end.
U.S. Withdrawal
from Afghanistan: 'Please Don't Wait Until 2014!' (The Nation, Pakistan)
"While
Americans might find it unpalatable to ponder, they must be made aware that not
only is it unlikely that their forces will meet their goals, but they are in
fact acting as a destabilizing force for the entire region. Until they are
withdrawn, there can be no stability in the area, and thus their withdrawal
should proceed as fast as possible. ... Pakistan must make the United States realize
that there is nothing sacred about the 2014 date - and certainly nothing sacred
about the end of that year."
By a heavy majority, 62 to 33, the U.S. Senate approved a
non-binding amendment (#3096)
calling for the withdrawal of American forces from Afghanistan. According to
media reports, the mover of the resolution, Senator Jeff Merkley, said that the
time had come to withdraw, as al-Qaeda was no longer in a position to launch a
major attack on American soil, and so the long war should be brought to an end.
However, the underlying message is that not even Americans understand why they have
66,000 troops in Afghanistan until the end of 2014.
The resolution calls for something that is now a matter
of mere haggling; the exact date when the forces should be withdrawn. That they
are to be withdrawn in 2014 is clear, but the diehards have pressed so
successfully for staying as long as possible, it is assumed that this means the
end of the year. The current argument is that a U.S. contingent is needed for
the Afghan elections in 2014, when term limits mean that a collaborationist
president other than HamidKarzai
must be found. That is an implicit admission of failure of America's strategy
and its plan to train the Afghan Army, particularly given the prevalence of
green-on-blue attacks.
However, while Americans might find it unpalatable to
ponder, they must be made aware that not only is it unlikely that their forces will
meet their goals, but they are in fact acting as a destabilizing force for the entire
region. Until they are withdrawn, there can be no stability in the area, and
thus their withdrawal should proceed as fast as possible. The American people
must not be given contradictory signals, especially by Pakistani diplomacy,
which should be working for regional stability.
Posted by Worldmeets.US
Indeed, the ultimate realization among Americans may well
be due to Pakistani efforts, which have consistently emphasized that Pakistan's
interest in Afghanistan is in seeing it attain stability - and that this
stability can only be achieved if U.S. forces withdraw. Pakistan must make the United
States realize that there is nothing sacred about the 2014 date - and certainly
nothing sacred about the end of that year.