http://www

'CAMERON SEDUCES INDIA, AS OBAMA AND ZARDARI LOOK ON'

[Guardian Unlimited, U.K.]

 

 

The Frontier Post, Pakistan

Pakistan's 'Ruling Clan of Bleating Sheep' Soil the Nation

 

"Who will tell these ignoramuses that the street doesn't give a damn if this war is affected [by Wikileaks' release] or even if it goes completely haywire, when it's become such an open wound on our body politic? It has cost the nation dearly in blood and treasure without gaining us honest gratitude from anywhere in the world. Rather than benefitting us, it has earned us nothing but widespread pillory and abuse."

 

EDITORIAL

 

July 30, 2010

 

Pakistan - The Frontier Post - Original Article (English)

Prime Minister David Cameron, visiting India to boost jobs in Britain with a trade deal, has whipped up a hornet's nest in Pakistan by siding with the views of India Prime Minister Singh, who believes that that Pakistan must do more to fight terrorists.

 

BBC NEWS VIDEO: David Cameron defends 'frank' comments about Pakistan and terror, July 29, 00:02:33RealVideo

Hubristically-arrogant British Prime Minister David Cameron cheekily states that Pakistan is exporting terrorism, and picks up thunderous cheers from his Indian audience, along with a purchase order from the Indian government for dozens of trainer jets worth over $1 billion. A disputed Afghan President, Hamid Karzai, who has little authority beyond the outer gates of his presidential palace and the municipality of Kabul, leaps upon the publication of U.S. military files by Wikileaks and screams for Afghan Taliban "sanctuaries" in Pakistan to be taken out. And what's the response of Islamabad's cringing and servile hierarchy to these audacious outpourings by Cameron and Karzai? The entire ruling clan of sheep can only bleat of how this will impact negatively on the "war on terror!" President Zardari mumbles it, as do Prime Minister Gilani, Foreign Minister Qureshi and all the rest.

 

Who will tell these ignoramuses that the street doesn’t give a damn if this war is affected or not, or even if it goes completely haywire, when it's become such an open wound on our body politic? It has cost the nation dearly in blood and treasure without gaining us honest gratitude from anywhere in the world. Rather than benefiting us, it has earned us nothing but widespread pillory and abuse. Over 3,000 of our soldiers have sacrificed their precious lives for this war. In this war, thousands of our civilian compatriots, including children and women, have been slaughtered in U.S. drone attacks and terrorist strikes by thugs that were bred, nurtured, funded, and armed by the CIA-led evil axis of India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and Afghanistan’s National Directorate of Security (NDS).

 

British Prime Minister David Cameron and Indian Prime Minister

Manmohan Singh express complete agreement about how Pakistan

must do more to combat terrorism, July 29.

[CLICK HERE OR CLICK PHOTO TO WATCH BBC REPORT]

 

Our economy is a tottering cripple for this war, with the losses inflicted amounting to some $40 billion or more. Due to the insecurity that proxies and agents of this evil axis of foreign agencies have spawned, domestic investment is fleeing and dread among foreign investors is rising. For this war, our sovereignty stands violated and our national solidarity in tatters.

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

Given all this, one would think that reaction in Islamabad to the audacity of Cameron and Karzai would be severe, manly and intense. Appallingly, it is not. The response has been effeminate, befitting a woman and not a man. It doesn't appear that Islamabad’s hierarchs are even aware of how the street is boiling with anger over the impudence of Cameron, as well as that staunchly-loyal CIA asset, Karzai. Karzai has blindly and slavishly done its bidding, going so far as to anoint Indians as he and his governor's senior advisors, themselves CIA appointees.

 

People had hoped President Zardari would have at least postponed if not cancelled his upcoming visit to London, as a way of registering his nation’s outrage at Cameron’s filthy inanity. He has not. Perhaps to him, the coronation of a prince regent, who he's touting as the nation’s next ruler, counts for more than his the popular sentiment of his people [Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, son of President Zardari and the assassinated Benazir Bhutto, is to launch his political career at a rally in Britain on August 7th]. Yet if he is so loath to crown his prince at home among the people his rule is to be foisted upon, why not have the coronation in France, which he also plans to visit at Pakistan taxpayer expense? But if he's so resolved to stage this regal coronation in the shadow of great palaces of kings and queens in London, let him have the pleasure.

 

[The Independent, U.K.]

 

SEE ALSO ON THIS:

Cuarto Poder, Spain: WikiLeaks Makes Clear Obama's Bush-Era Scorched Earth Policy

Estadao, Brazil: Obama 'War of Necessity' Seems Worse than Bush 'War of Choice'

Outlook Afghanistan: WikiLeaks Memos Say Ex-ISI Chief Plotted Karzai Murder
The Nation, Pakistan: WikiLeaks: U.S. Scapegoats ISI to 'Hide its Own Shame'

The Frontier Post, Pakistan: Facing Defeat in Afghanistan, U.S. 'Lies' About ISI

The Nation, Pakistan: Indo-U.S. Alliance Behind Entry of Militants Into Pakistan
Frankfurter Rundschau, Germany: WikiLeaks' Enlightened Betrayal

Der Speigel, Germany: Explosive Leaks Provide Image of War from Those Fighting It
Der Speigel, Germany: Task Force 373: The Secret Hunters
Guardian Video, U.K.: WikiLeaks Founder Tells Why Public Must See Documents

Guardian, U.K.: Complete Investigation of the Secret Afghanistan War Logs
Guardian, U.K.: U.S. Commanders Point the Finger at Pakistan

Times of India: WikiLeaks Release Shows Undeclared War by Pakistan on India

Hindustan Times, India: ‘Pakistan Intelligence Paid Taliban to Kill Indians in Kabul’

 

Bookmark and Share

 

While in London during his meeting with Cameron, will President Zardari find the guts to ask a few relevant questions? Will he ask him why, after Britain took it upon itself the responsibility of freeing occupied Afghanistan from drugs, the country has instead become the world’s biggest producer and supplier? Will he ask him why, when the occupiers had promised to pacify post-Taliban Afghanistan, British troops remained for years on their secured bases in Kabul and Bagram? Will he tell him that when British troops finally ventured out to Helmand in 2006, the then British defense secretary squawked that they would wrest it from the Taliban without firing a shot?    

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

Yet, four years on, they have failed to capture even a notable portion of it, and American Marines have had to be deployed by the thousands, though they, too, have spectacularly failed at the task. Will he ask Cameron why American soldiers playfully ridicule the fighting mettle of British troops, derisively calling them chickens? And why the command of British troops has been taken away from a British commander and given to American officers, amid reports that the British contingent had been bribing local Taliban not to attack it?

 

But isn’t this expecting too much from an Islamabad leadership that has demonstrated itself to be a spineless pack of self-styled leaders without which the nation would be much better off? They are worse than the dictator Pervez Musharraf, who threw this poor nation into such a demeaning state by performing like a red-light district dancing girl for his American patrons.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US July 31, 10:19pm]

 







Bookmark and Share