[The Times, U.K.]
Kommersant, Russia
For Russia, Obama's
the Best of
a Bad Lot
"Barack
Obama looks like the candidate that can be expected to take the greatest
strides toward Russia, since unlike McCain, he's not infected with any Cold War
phobias, and unlike Clinton, he won’t be tied down by the old habits of his
advisors."
By Konstantin Kosachev*
Translated By Igor Medvedev
February 7, 2008
Kommersant
- Russia - Original Article (Russian)
The bet by Democrats that Americans want to change
everything from U.S. policy to their leader's sex and race may be fully
justified. But I wouldn't focus exclusively on the intrigues of the Democratic
race. After all, the race won't be decided until November, and the competition
won’t be between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, but between a Democrat and a
Republican. And it is still too early to write the Republicans off.
From the
Russian point of view, the choice is not a pleasant one. Senator McCain, who is
known for comments on Russia that run along the lines of “Carthage must be
destroyed,” is certainly no gift. His desire to expel Russia from the G8, like
many other of his positions that are in the style of the Cold War, are sincere.
Traditionally it has been felt that we [Russia] get along better with
Republicans, but apparently this senator-veteran seems ready to break that
stereotype.
Our
problem with the Democrats is that (in our view), they place too much emphasis
on ideologically-driven human rights issues. However under the current
administration, Washington's ideology-based foreign policy probably exceeds
that of their domestic opponents. It's clearly time that we stopped
"fearing" the Democrats, especially in terms of the inevitable
"democratic moralizing" by a Democratic president. For a country that
has made its democratic choice, such calculations are largely unimportant.
|
Zbigniew Brzezinski
|
|
|
In terms
of attitude toward Russia, neither the declarations of Hillary Clinton nor
those of Barack Obama go beyond the traditional views of the American
establishment. Both candidates say they recognize the need to cooperate with
Russia. But how sincere these statements are is difficult to judge. We know
that Clinton has retained many people from her husband's team that have no
particular love for Russia. Obama, as they say, is not shy about communicating
with Zbigniew Brzezinski [considered a Kremlin foe].
Posted by WORLDMEETS.US
Nevertheless,
it's important, for example, to seek and obtain progress in disarmament. This
will be very important to Russia and vital to strengthening international
security - and that possibility will arise with the victory of the Democratic
candidate. Tired of Republican militarism, this is something that we and many
Europeans will support.
|
Russia's
President-elect Dmitry Medvedev
|
|
|
In any
event, the future President of the United States will have to deal with the new
leader in the Kremlin [Dmitry
Medvedev]. For better or worse, relations with America
have usually depended on personal relations between the nations' leaders, and
the new man in the Kremlin may well get along with the new man [or woman?] in
the White House.
Posted by WORLDMEETS.US
In this
regard, Barack Obama looks like the candidate that can be expected to take the
greatest strides toward Russia, since unlike McCain, he's not infected with any
Cold War phobias, and unlike Clinton, he won’t be tied down by the old habits
of his advisors.
*Konstantin Kosachev,
Chairman the Duma Foreign Affairs Committee
CLICK HERE FOR RUSSIAN
VERSION
[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US March 3, 8:44am]