Victory Day in the USSR, 1945: Western suggestions that

the Soviets were allied with Hitler have incensed Russians.

 

 

Izvestia, Russia

Western WWII Amnesia: It Was USSR that 'Saved Humanity'

 

"The USSR broke 80 percent of Germany's divisions and lost 27 million people to the Nazi extermination machine. The Soviet Victory Generation saved humanity. Everyone on this planet understood that in 1945. In 2009, many don't want to."

 

By Vyacheslav Nikonov

                                        

 

Translated By Yekaterina Blinova

 

September 10, 2009

 

Russia - Izvestia - Original Article (Russian)

On Aug. 15, 1945, two young Americans celebrate final victory in World War II. But Russians would like to remind the rest of the world that it was they - and not the Americans, British or French - that broke the back of the German Army. And it was the USSR that paid the heaviest price in blood: about 25 million were killed.

 

RUSSIA TODAY NEWS: Russia-Poland relations strained over historical revisionism, Sept 1., 00:04:33RealVideo

What a remarkable thing: the more time passes since the Second World War, the more we [Russians] have to explain ourselves. The years have washed away historical memory, substituting it with versions more favorable to others. Now it is said that the USSR unleashed the war and acted as Hitler’s ally, and it's no longer clear who won it. And why is there this idea that September of 1939 was the beginning of the war? Because that's when Britain and France formally joined in? Are we to understand that everything that happened before that date wasn't part of the war because Western democracies don't count it as such?

 

[Editor's Note: Under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of August, 1939, between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, Northern and Eastern Europe were divided into German and Soviet spheres of influence. Poland was to be split between Germany and the USSR. The German attack on Polish soil began on September 1, 1939. The Russian attack began on September 17. That is why most historians mark 1939 as the start of the war].

 

From the standpoint of our country (and history), World War II began in the early 1930s, when Japan invaded China,  annexed North Manchuria and set up the puppet state of Manchukuo. Soviet-Japanese clashes occurred regularly, but in the West, did anyone consider this a serious war? In Germany Hitler came to power, having set out with the purpose of world domination - his first step being the destruction of communism and the extermination of inferior peoples, among which were the Slavs, Balts and Jews. Japan and Germany signed the Anti-Comintern Pact aimed exclusively at our destruction. The war in Spain was not merely a civil one, as Germany was actually one of the belligerents to the conflict, as well as, let us note, the Soviet Union [Hitler provided weapons and aid to fascist General Francisco Franco, while the Soviets sided with Spain's Republican government].

 

Fascist Italy, the third ally of the Anti-Comintern Pact - invaded Eritrea and then Albania, over the indignant cries of Moscow and amid the nearly complete silence of Western capitals. Germany then conducted the annexation of Austria - the West was silent. In Munich, Czechoslovakia was sacrificed and Czechoslovakian requests for Soviet aid along with its right to resist were forbidden to it. Even Poland participated in the partitioning of the Czech Republic. In the days when Germany was preparing to attack Poland, we were already engaged in a fully-fledged war with the Japanese, who had invaded the territory of our ally, Mongolia. Over 10,000 Red Army soldiers died in the Battle of Khalkhyn Gol. By September of 1939, World War II had already been going on for a decade, and it wasn't the Soviet Union that initiated it, nor did it pursue a policy of appeasing aggressors.

 

Before the summer of 1939, every major European power - except the USSR - had negotiated and concluded all kinds of treaties and agreements with Hitler. Why did Soviet leaders begin talking to Berlin? Because Germany launched its policy of “pushing to the East” and an attack on Poland was being discussed almost openly and officially. For Moscow, the question was whether it was possible to stop the aggression with agreements on joint guarantees for Polish security with Western democracies. And if not, where would German troops stop after attacking the Poles? In Warsaw? Minsk? Moscow? Vladivostok?

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

At a ceremony in Gdansk, Poland to commemorate the 70th anniversary

of WWII, which began with a Nazi attack on Poland - President Kaczynski

of Poland described the Russian invasion of Poland that followed the Nazi

one, as a 'stab in the back.'

[WATCH VIDEO BY CLICKING HERE OR CLICKING ON THE PHOTO ABOVE.]

 

The USSR was able and willing to help Poland - which was openly hostile to us at the time. But for that to happen, she would have had to allow us to help and accept security guarantees from our side. But no one was able to convince her to do so. Poland might have been helped by France and Britain, if they would have sent Berlin the message that they were prepared to fight Germany if it attacked Poland. Instead, Western powers sent Hitler reassuring signals that war would be declared, but not actually fought. And it wasn’t - until the Germans attacked them.

 

Of course, the Soviet Union would have preferred an alliance with the Western democracies - at least they didn't plan to destroy us en masse - and it suggested such an alliance. However, regretfully, the Soviet Union still wasn't seen by Paris and London as a nation with which “proper” countries could ally themselves. Talks were taking place in Moscow, but as it turned out, British and French representatives didn't have the authority to enter into any sort of agreement. The countdown to an attack on Poland was down to days, and the probability of, say, a British-German agreement, was many times more likely than a British-Soviet agreement. What must Moscow do, when Berlin is offering a non-aggression pact and a line beyond which German troops wouldn't go after having invaded Poland, while London, Paris and Warsaw have no desire to make any kind of a deal?

 

The non-aggression pact with Germany, as Winston Churchill wrote, was a cynical and coldly-calculated political move. It gave us a chance to avoid going to war with the Germans and build up our military capabilities - in just two years, USSR defense potential doubled. And it also made it possible to start the war - the inevitability of which no one in the Kremlin doubted for a second - with strategically-acceptable borders (in August, 1939, the border ran  just 18 miles west of Minsk). Those were borders that in all fairness, Bolshevik leaders believed were unfairly imposed on the USSR during the period of its greatest weakness - the years of the [Russian] Civil war [1917-1923, aka/ the Russian Revolution].  

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

 

 

SEE ALSO ON THIS:  

NRC Handelblad, Netherlands: On 70th Anniversary of War, Wounds in Europe Still Sting  

Izvestia, Russia: Truman and Churchill No Better Than Stalin

Izvestia, Russia: 'Shocking' Russian and American Ignorance About World War II

Vedemosti, Russia: Soviet Theft of American Nuclear Secrets Was Fully Justified

Le Monde, France: The Danger to the West of Not 'Helping Russia'

Der Spiegel, Germany: Why Wasn't Hitler Stopped?

Der Spiegel, Germany: German Editorial Roundup on 70 Years After WW II

Guardian Unlimited: This Rewriting of History is Spreading Europe's Poison

The Telegraph, U.K.: Vatican Says U.S. and Britain Knew of Nazi Murder of Jews and Did Nothing
The Times: Does Appeasement Look So Bad, 70 Years Later?

 

Bookmark and Share    

 

 

Did Poland and the Baltic countries have reason to be incensed by Soviet policies? Without a doubt. Their territories, which over the next several months became part of the USSR, not only lost their sovereignty, but experienced for themselves and in an accelerated fashion, all the severity of revolutionary law that since 1917 had become so familiar to Soviet citizens. There were a great many tragedies for those countries and their citizens, one of which was [the massacre of over 20,000 Polish officers in] Katyn. Another question is, if these territories had already been occupied by the Nazis in August of 1939, would they have fared better? Of course, the Soviet Union at the time was guided exclusively by its own interests, as it was with all other countries. Of course, everyone else would have preferred the Soviet Union to have already begun fighting Germany in the fall of 1939, which would have happened if not for the Molotov-Ribbentrop non-aggression pact.

 

The Soviet Union never became a German ally, it simply snatched some breathing space. Stalin never believed Hitler - and neither did Stalin's closest advisers. The USSR wasn't guilty of starting the war. That was unleashed by Germany and its real allies, Japan and Italy - an issue that was reliably established at the Nuremberg Tribunal, the verdict of which some are now attempting to bury.

 

What was the role of the Soviet Union in the war? It broke 80 percent of Germany's divisions and lost 27 million people to the Nazi extermination machine. There is no family that wasn't affected by the tragedy of that war.

 

The Soviet Victory Generation saved humanity. Everyone on this planet understood that in 1945. In 2009, many don't want to.

 

*Vyacheslav Nikonov is President of Russia's Polity Foundation

 

CLICK HERE FOR RUSSIAN VERSION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted by WORLDMEETS.US September 13, 5:59pm]

 






Bookmark and Share