http://worldmeets.us/images/FIFA-removingthehead_jeopbertrams.jpg

Jeop Bertrams, The Netherlands

[Click Here for More Jeop Bertrams Cartoons]

 

 

Not Even the FBI Can Turn Sports Bodies into 'Vestals' (Folha, Brazil)

 

"A mere police operation, even of a large scale as is the case now with the FBI against FIFA, will not suffice to alter the course of world sport. None of this will transform the members of sports organizations into vestals. … The arrogance of international sports bodies always prevails and over time - survives. They are organized, powerful and influential organizations. So they must be permanently monitored for the purposes of ensuring at least a minimum of control and to inhibit excesses."

 

By Edgard Alves*

                              http://worldmeets.us/images/edgard-alves_mug.jpg

 

Translated By Ricardo Farinha

 

June 21, 2015

 

Brazil – Folha – Original Article (Portuguese)

A mere police operation, even of a large scale as is the case now with the FBI against FIFA, will not suffice to alter the course of world sport. None of this will transform the members of sports organizations into vestals. For some time, they will certainly be more cautious. Even so, episodes and outcomes like the FIFA case always bring comfort.

 

This type of operation, in which the corrupt and the criminal are punished - usually the most vulgar, insatiable and daring, triggers a general feeling of relief. Only time, however, will reveal with any certainty the true impact of an operation of this magnitude.

 

The position of IOC President Thomas Bach, a German, is worth registering. Bach underlined the need for FIFA to implement "appropriate" and "painful but absolutely necessary" reforms. Yet he chose not to engage in the debate about the resignation of Sepp Blatter, who had just been re-elected for a fifth consecutive term, nor would he comment on the calling of new elections in world football's governing body.

 

 

 

In 2002, the IOC had its own bitter experience with the scandal over vote buying at the Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City. Things already seemed on the wrong track in the run-up to the Games and the mistakes that built up exploded when the scandal finally broke. It was, at the time, a warning about the precarious way the Games are administered and how vulnerable to abuse. Meanwhile, no drastic changes to the IOC's course or attitude have been seen.

 

Finally last December, the IOC adopted its Agenda 2020, a reform package for framing the Olympic movement in the context of today’s world. It contains 40 recommendations to bring things up to date, chiefly aimed at reducing costs and making the Games more viable. 

 

This was no gesture of goodwill, but the result of international pressure and a global situation punished by economic crises. These issues, plus the sheer gigantism of the Olympics, assumed such proportions that the event became virtually unbearable even for cities with the potential to host it. 

 

A serious situation became yet more alarming when only Beijing, China, and Almaty, Kazakhstan, remained in the running to host the 2022 Winter Games, with the final decision still to be made. Four other cities interested in the Games (Stockholm, Sweden; Krakow, Poland; Lviv, Ukraine; and Oslo, Norway) withdrew from the race because of the demands of the letter of commitments.

 

Agenda 2020 will only come into force for the 2024 Olympics. Despite this, the organization of the 2020 Tokyo Games will already enjoy the support of the new measures, particularly with respect to cost containment, the use of existing sports facilities and more affordable temporary facilities.

 

The Rio Olympics in 2016, in turn, will mark a milestone that will go down in the history of the Games, as it's the last of those with characteristics of gigantism. It is the end of an era. The existing limit on the number of participating athletes will be maintained, that is, 10,500 for the Summer Olympics and 2,900 for the Winter Games.

 

The budget estimate for next year's Games is around $12 billion, yet that figure is likely to rise. The construction site is extensive and the deadlines, with no chance of extension, will be a challenge to meet. Last year, the Sochi Winter Olympics in Sochi cost no less than $51 billion.

Posted By Worldmeets.US

 

What countries would be able to bear such a rapid escalation in costs? After Rio, the Olympic Games will move to Asia, with the 2020 Summer Games in Tokyo, the 2018 Winter Games in Pyeongchang, South Korea, and the 2020 Winter Games in Beijing or Almaty.

 

Agenda 2020 includes other curious recommendations. One says that the IOC will provide its accounts and expenditures to international auditing companies for analysis and assessment, something that isn't even mandatory, the organization says.

 

 

SEE ALSO ON THIS:

Folha, Brazil: The FIFA Scandal and Putin's (Near) Admission of Guilt

Le Temps, Switzerland: Sepp Blatter Toppled by So-Called 'Masters of the World'

Le Quotidien d'Oran, Algeria: FIFA: Making it Safe for UEFA to Exploit the South

El Watan, Algeria: Hard Luck for Algeria; Success for 'Children of Uncle Sam'

Echorouk al-Yawm, Algeria: Elimination of U.S., England a 'Love Letter' for Gaza

Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Germany: In U.S., Germany, Shared Derision Over Referees

Guardian, U.K.: FIFA Declares Itself Satisfied With 'Standard of Referees'

 

That's an apparently sensible gesture, since the organization juggles some atronomical numbers. TV rights are an example. For the four Olympic Games ending in 2020, the IOC signed $4.4 billion contract with U.S. broadcaster NBCUniversal. That figure almost doubled for the period 2021 to 2032 [$7.65 billion – also to be broadcast by NBCUniversal. 

 

Another recommendation concerns an age limit of 70 years for a person to be an IOC member. After that, one can continue to be a member for another four years, although such appointments "should be limited."

 

The IOC president's term of office is eight years with the possibility of an additional four. However, that won't guarantee a change in power as a well-functioning group can control the institution.

 

The sport gained such global prominence in recent years that the United Nations recognized its autonomy in a resolution adopted by consensus last November.

 

The practical effect of the measure is that the U.N. will ensure national Olympic committees autonomy in their relation with local governments. The purpose is to encourage political neutrality and reduce boycotts in competitions and discrimination of any kind.

 

The U.N. resolution also acknowledges sport as a means of promoting education, health, development and peace. The FIFA episode proved the reverse, with outlaws on one side and heroes on the other, as in the cinema.

 

The arrogance of international sports bodies always prevails and over time - survives. They are organized, powerful and influential organizations. So they must be permanently monitored for the purposes of ensuring at least a minimum of control and to inhibit excesses.

 

*Edgard Alves has been a sports journalist since 1971 and writes about Olympics-related issues. He has participated in the coverage of six Olympic Games and four Pan American Games

 

CLICK HERE FOR PORTUGUESE VERSION

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted By Worldmeets.US June 21, 2015, 1:25pm]

 

 

 

 

 

Live Support