http://worldmeets.us/images/taliban-afghan-surrender_pic.png

Three of 35 Taliban who recently turned themselves in and handed

over their weapons as part of Kabul's reconciliation and reintegration

program, in Herat Province. Could it be that the dire predictions for

Afghanistan's future are overblown?

 

 

Unwarranted Pessimism Over Leaving Afghanistan (Die Zeit, Germany)

 

"Many Taliban have always said that they took up their arms to fight the occupiers and drive them out of the country. It is possible that now, a good number of Taliban will lay down their arms since they have succeeded in achieving what they set out to do. ... The history of modern Afghanistan gives little cause for optimism, but there is one thing we ought to remember: The greatest misfortunes for Afghanistan have come from the outside."

 

By Ulrich Ladurner

                             http://worldmeets.us/images/Ulrich-Ladurner_mug.jpg

 

Translated By Katarzyna Wisniewska

 

February 24, 2013

 

Germany - Die Zeit - Original Article (German)

American troops in Afghanistan: Will thier absence result in more or less calamity?

BBC NEWS VIDEO: Afghanistan civilian casualties fall, but there are no celebrations, Feb. 19, 00:02:49RealVideo

In 2014, the last NATO combat troops will have left Afghanistan. The Americans want to leave no more than 10,000 men in the country. What will happen next? At the moment, most of the scenarios being posed are gloomy. They range from civil war to a return of the Taliban.

 

There are certainly many good reasons to doubt that Afghanistan will find peace after 2014. Still, it is amazing how little credit we give the Afghans. After all, Afghanistan is their country. Given that, we should assume they will know best how to move toward reconciliation.

 

But no! We believe that the withdrawal of NATO troops will inevitably lead to another disaster. If the parents are out, the children will argue. This reflects a blatantly paternalistic attitude.

 

The purpose of this assertion is easy to see through. Imagined and anticipated violence in Afghanistan serves to justify a mission that is drawing to a close. "See what they do without us! They strike each other dead!" By implication, this means “when we were still there, things were better." NATO has always made itself out to be a kind of a benevolent father who keeps the violent and unruly children under control. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Posted By Worldmeets.US

 

NATO has always been a war party, supporting one side against the other. And even when its representatives claimed that they wanted to establish democracy, rule of law and human rights, they were following their own strategic interests. This is legitimate, but it must also be said. NATO has certainly not finished the war. Rather, it is the war that has set NATO ablaze.

 

 

SEE ALSO ON THIS:
The Nation, Pakistan: U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan: 'Please Don't Wait Until 2014!'
FTD, Germany: The Beginning of the End for the Bundeswehr in Afghanistan
The Nation, Pakistan: U.S.-Afghan-Taliban Talks Must Benefit Pakistan, Not India
Guardian, U.K.: U.S. Suspends Joint Military Operations with Afghan Forces

Telegraph, U.K.: Taliban Hit U.S.- U.K. Afghan Base; 'Miss' Prince Harry

The Independent, U.K.: Obama's Foreign Policy of Reconciliation in 'Tatters'

Frontier Post, Pakistan: Obama's Drone War a PR Disaster for America

Der Spiegel, Germany: President of Dissapointment: How Obama Failed to Deliver

Frontier Post, Pakistan: Panetta Spills Beans: U.S. Handing Afghanistan to India
Thawra Al-Wada, Syria: Middle East Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood
Tunis Hebdo, Tunisia: A Method to Bush's Madness?
The Frontier Post: Co-opted U.S. Media Will Always Blame Pakistan
The Frontier Post: Just Say 'Thank You' to Cut in American Aid
The Frontier Post: Letter to A.Q. Khan Resembles CIA Iraq War Forgery
Guardian, U.K.: Pakistani Generals 'Helped Sell Nuclear Secrets'
Guardian, U.K.: Pakistan Hits Back at Mullen Over Journalist's Murder Claim
Dawn, Pakistan: Even if U.S. Nuclear Accusations are True, Pakistan Broke No Law
Asia Times, Hong Kong: America Homes in on al-Qaeda's New Chief
The Nation, Pakistan: CIA Chief Panetta Says Zawahiri Living in Pakistan
The Frontier Post, Pakistan: Obama Withdrawal Plans 'Spell Doom' for Pakistan
The Frontier Post, Pakistan: Karzai Finally Awakens to American Treachery
The Daily Jang, Pakistan: The Beginning of the End of U.S. in Afghanistan?

 

 

Could it be that after 2014, the Afghans will find peace? It's possible, even if the going is tough. Here are a few of the reasons they might.

 

The Afghan Army has already taken responsibility for security in most of the country. It is frequently involved in firefights and more and more of its troops are being killed in them. But overall, the number of attacks, assassinations and raids has dropped. This means that even the Taliban have changed their strategy.

 

But why? Many Taliban have always said that they took up their arms to fight the occupiers and drive them completely out of the country. It is possible that now, a good number of Taliban will lay down their arms - after all, they are a very diverse group - since they have succeeded in achieving what they set out to do.

 

The history of modern Afghanistan gives little cause for optimism, but there is one thing we ought to remember: The greatest misfortunes for Afghanistan have come from the outside.

 

CLICK HERE FOR GERMAN VERSION

 

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted By Worldmeets.US Feb. 24, 2013, 7:12am