http://www

Secretary of State Rice and Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari

In Baghdad, Jan. 15. Could her newfound optimism is misplaced?

 

 

Azzaman, Iraq

Rice's Misplaced

Enthusiasm Over

Progress in Iraq …

 

"Rice's visit in itself is not important, but what she said this time was. Rather than her previous expressions of dissatisfaction over the rate of Iraqi political reform, this time she expressed 'cautious optimism,' accompanied by declarations of 'joy,' over what has been accomplished. … This is a new catastrophe in terms of American comprehension of Iraq's  new laws."

 

By Fatih Abdulsalam

                          

 

Translated By James Jacobson and Nicolas Dagher

 

January 16, 2008

 

Iraq - Azzaman - Original Article (Arabic)

One journalist asked me: “Why didn’t President Bush include Iraq in his tour of the Middle East?”

 

I said: “Maybe it’s because Iraq has become American in spirit and only its body is in the Middle East ... He said: “You know that what you're saying is no joke, but was the goal of the Iraq War in the first place.”

 

I said: “I don’t know, but I doubt the Americans have much of a chance of weaving their dreams of dominance over Iraq any longer ... even with their allies running it."

 

The journalist said: “You didn’t answer ... why didn’t Bush come to visit Iraq?” I told him: “he might return to Iraq soon or send one of his top officials."  

 

I had barely completed my sentence when a nearby TV announced that Condoleezza Rice had arrived in Baghdad WATCH . Such visits need not be announced beforehand. Visits to Iraq by White House officials are part of a normal routine and may not even be on a special tour's itinerary.

 

So Rice's visit in itself is not important, but what she said this time was. Rather than her previous expressions of dissatisfaction over the rate of Iraqi political reform, this time she expressed “cautious optimism,” accompanied by declarations of "joy," over what has been accomplished.

 

This is a new catastrophe in terms of American comprehension of Iraq's  new laws, among which is the Justice and Accountability Law. This is no great leap forward in terms of the quality of life in Iraq, especially since it comes five years after so many other failed experiments, accords, contracts, and legal prosthetics.

 

[Editor's Note: The Justice and Accountability Law, championed ny the Bush Adminsitration, allows former officials of Saddam Hussein's Baath Party to return to public life and to apply for their pensions, among other things. President Bush hailed the law's passage as "an important step toward reconciliation.]"

 

To have laws passed in the Parliament only to have them rejected later by those seeking reconciliation should not be the source of optimism, nor is it an extraordinary achievement, since passage was achieved by quasi-government fiat [they were passed with massive government pressure as if they were edicts].

 

Why does American enthusiasm appear so much greater than is warranted by Iraqi reticence over the Oil and the Gas law, and before that, the previous rejection of the Justice and Accountability Law?

 

[Editor's Note: Passage of the Oil and Gas Law, another piece of legislation that the White House has pushed very hard on, is bogged down by a dispute between Kurdish and Arab leaders over who has the final say in managing oil and gas fields].

 

Iraqi political leaders are addicted to prefabricated recipes prepared in the American kitchen, and when they think of an “Iraqi” solution, it's usually a mangled imitation of an unworkable plan that came before. And thus, the wheel spins on ...

 

Click Here for Arabic Version

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted Jan. 21, 11:57pm]