Russian anger proves self-defeating: After Washington passed a law
to punish Russian officials involved in the murder of a whistleblowing
lawyer who worked for an American company, Russia passed a law
which punishes Americans who may have wanted to adopt Russian
orphans. Many Russians find it hard to see the connection.
Duma Reaction to Magnitsky Bill Deals Blow to
Russian Orphans - and Duma (Izvestia, Russia)
"The ban on adoptions is itself such a hot topic, that just discussing it has led to acute social and political turmoil. ... Photographs of poor suffering children who will now never see the American dream are migrating from blog to blog. The gut-wrenching, not at all Christmassy stories of the fates of orphans who couldn't be spirited away in time, are being passed around. ... Duma members have now brought down an avalanche of bitter and angry questions on their heads - about the nightmare of our orphanages, murders and rapes in our foster care system, and nonexistent child patient survival - and socialization."
Igor Karaulov*
Translated By Anastassia Tapsieva
December 25, 2012
Russia - Izvestia - Original Article (Russian)
|
It may be about orhphans today, but it all goes back to Sergei Magnitsky: His death in a Russian prison, after implicating top officials in a major tax fraud scheme, is widely regarded as a murder-cover-up in the West, and resulted in the U.S. Magnitsky Bill, which targets Russian officials. Now Moscow has passed its own legislation in retaliation. The trouble is, the Dima Yakovlev Bill, named after a Russian boy who choked to death after his adoptive U.S. dad forgot him in a car, hurts Russian orphans more than it does Americans.
RUSSIA TODAY VIDEO:
American adoptions of Russians - To ban or not to ban?, Dec. 18, 00:02:29
|
|
|
The State Duma has slipped on a
banana peel. All it had to do was respond to the Sultan of Washington's "Magnitsky Bill" -
by coming up with something commensurate and symbolic, and then close shop for
New Year’s recess with a clear conscience. Instead, a strange and inexplicable
thing happened: the primary measure of retaliation was a ban on American
adoptions of Russian orphans, called the "Dima
Yakovlev Bill."
[Editor’s Note: Sergei Magnitsky was
jailed in 2008 on charges of tax evasion and fraud, after he implicated senior
Russian officials in a complex scheme to defraud the government, and died
awaiting trial. Magnitsky's colleagues say the charges against him were fabricated
by investigators, whom Magnitsky had accused of being involved in the theft of
$230 million of state funds through fraudulent tax returns. The U.S. Congress
responded by passing the Magnitsky Bill, which punishes Russian officials
thought to be responsible for Magnitsky's death, by prohibiting their entrance
into the United States and freezing their U.S. assets. Now, in retaliation,
Russian lawmakers have passed the Dima
Yakovlev Bill, named after a Russian boy who choked to death because his
adoptive American father forgot him in a car. The bill seeks to prevent U.S. citizens from adopting Russian orphans,
freezes the assets of Americans with assets in Russia deemed to have
"violated the rights" of Russian citizens, and excludes them from the country].
The fact that this measure has nothing to do with Magnitsky
is only half the problem. The ban on adoptions is itself such a hot topic, that
just discussing it has led to acute social and political turmoil. Even as four Duma members spoke out against the bill, it was quickly
pushed through the Duma - and who can remember the
last time that happened?
As for the reaction of the public, it's as if the gates of hell burst open - a hell we hadn't seen since Pussy Riot. Some cite Alexander Galich: "We'll remember the names of everyone who raised their hand." Others handed out obscene cartoons of the key sponsor of the bill, Duma Member Ekaterina Lahova, which doesn't do her any good - and repeated the rhetoric of Vladimir Semichastny against Boris Pasternak.
[Editor's Note: In 1958, Vladimir Semichastny, an up and Communist Party operative under Nikita Khrushchev, led a smear campaign against Boris Pasternak, after he was nominated for the Nobel prize in literature. Among other things, Semichastny said of Pasternak, who had just written Doctor Zhivago, "Even a pig doesn't foul his own sty!"].
Photographs of poor, suffering children who will now never
see the American dream, are migrating from blog to blog. The gut-wrenching, not
at all Christmassy stories of the fates of orphans who couldn't be spirited
away in time, are being passed around.
SEE ALSO ON THIS:
Svoboda News, Russia: Senators in U.S. Get Cold Shoulder Over Magnitsky Act
Moskovskij Komsomolets, Russia: Opposition Must ‘Learn to Swim’ – Not Complain to U.S.
Yezhednevniy Zhurnal, Russia: The Magnitsky List, America’s ‘Secret’ Weapon!
Kommersant, Russia: U.S. Magnitsky Act to Trigger 'Harsh Backlash'
Voice of Russia, Russia: Russian Opposition Wants Magnitsky List Expanded
Gazeta, Russia: Good Guys vs. Bad Guys: Russia Today is the Latter
Gazeta, Russia: America is Neither Friend Nor Foe
MK, Russia: Obama's ‘Hope’ Keeps Putin from ‘Window on Paradise’
Like
Worldmeets.US on Facebook
The most hysterical voices belong to unstinting adherents of
the America cult, which still flourishes among our bourgeois-intelligentsia. In
their world view, Americans are angels who deigned to descend from their
luminous heavens to rescue someone, anyone, from the icy Russian Mordor. And what kind of miscreant would
try and stop them?
Yet there are many sane and intelligent people who find the Duma members' plan repellant.
It's worth remembering that exporting children to the U.S.
is not an obligation of Russia. It is to Russia's benefit and is an act of good
will - like issuing visas. To show or not show good will is a sovereign matter
for each state, and in this respect there are differing positions. For
instance, the European Union doesn't recommend that its members allow adoption
of their children by foreigners - precisely because civilized countries find
this distasteful. Poor African nations, by contrast, readily pass their
children on. Unfortunately, in this case, we are the third world country. We,
too, trade our orphans: out of sight, out of mind. And this fits seamlessly
with our economic model: if we sell our crude oil and timber abroad, why not
our unwanted children? And if we've been officially dreaming of kicking our
addiction to the "raw material needle" for over 20 years, then
ceasing to export our children is obviously also a worthy goal.
HELP NON-PROFIT WORLDMEETS.US
RECOVER FROM HURRICIANE SANDY
But what if, as we try and reach the goal in a single leap,
we're throwing the baby out with the bathwater?: That parentless and often
disabled baby, living in an orphanage. Because Americans are strange people. An
American family may travel halfway around the world and pay a not insignificant
sum of money to choose a child with cerebral palsy or Down Syndrome. From our
perspective, it's an awkward business. It can't even be seen as the export of
children as much as the export of human suffering in its purest form. The
ingenious West has learned to recycle such suffering into a semblance of
happiness, similar to extracting has from shale. Until we ourselves capture
these social technologies, we will be forced to rely on foreign benefactors,
mainly U.S. citizens.
I think the most positive outcome to this unexpected crisis
would be an open revision of the state of affairs for our orphans, and then the
adoption of an ambitious plan in which there would be a step-by-step cessation
of foreign adoption (driven not by spite, but by the simple and understandable
desire for self respect), and which would be linked to specific indicators for
improvements in this area. Perhaps we will have stumbled upon a decent idea for
the nation.