'Crusader-Americans' Do Nothing As Iranians 'Invade' Iraq
"Somehow, America's aircraft,
which have complete control of Iraq's skies, can't spot an armed invasion in
the middle of the day. … The masks are now off of both new and old
occupations."
Iranian soldiers have invaded
Iraqi territory in broad daylight and occupied the Al Fakkah oil field near the
city of Al Amarra. Intelligence infiltration and theblind dependency of those with funny titles in the
Green Zone [Iraq officials] on the Mullahs of Qom is no longer enough for the Guardianship
of the Islamic Jurists [Iran].
It seems that in order to
steal more of its oil, the fictitious “Mahdi” decided to emerge from his
maze of lies and underground tunnels of faith to plant his heavy feet on Iraq's
wounded ground. It's a situation that mixes irony and tragedy in equal measure,
with the original invaders, the Crusader American military, playing the role of
deaf, dumb and blind. Neither its public statements nor its domestic
intelligence services saw the obvious Safavid [Iranian] occupation.
Somehow, America's aircraft, which have complete control of Iraq's skies, can't
spot an armed invasion in the middle of the day.
[Editor's Note: As an insult
to Iranian leaders, the author repeatedly refers to them as "Safavids." The Safavid
Dynasty ruled Iran for centuries and established the "Twelver school"
of Shiite Islam, which holds that the Shiite Messiah or "Mahdi" is
destined to reappear. In recent weeks, Iranian President Ahmadinejad has
repeatedly referred to the impending reemergence of the Mahdi. Calling Tehran Safavids is doubly
insulting, because it labels the mullahs monarchists, which is what the Iranian
Revolution rebelled against 30 years ago.]
Uncle Sam only mentioned the
Safavi invasion after it was exposed by the international media. The invading
Crusader continued with his suspicious, cold-blooded talk, and mentioned his “concern”
about Iranian “movements”!! With unbounded theatrical grotesqueness, an
American official went on to say that the event was an internal matter!! Truly,
according to psychiatry, Freudian slips reveal the secrets of the innermost
mind. In this case, we have the original invader admitting to the nearly-official
hegemony of his supposed enemy. Since when was an invasion by a foreign country
an "internal matter?"
Where are the decisions of
the United Nations, which continues to keep Iraq imprisoned under Chapter
VII? How did the obligations of the invading country evaporate when its
central obligation is to protect the state it has occupied from foreign
aggression?
[Editor's Note: After Saddam
Hussein's invasion of Kuwait in 1990, the United Security Council imposed extensive
sanctions under Chapter
VIIof the U.N. Charter. At the insistence
of Kuwait and other Gulf nations, many of the sanctions remain in place, as
the new Iraqi government has yet to pay reparations for Saddam's crimes].
If you wish to overlook the
wisdom of the foregoing, one might ponder the Security
Agreement that the Americans imposed on their followers in Baghdad. This
agreement requires the invading Americans to protect the borders, territories,
air space and territorial waters of Iraq from any aggression!! How did the
agreement evaporate after preoccupying us all for two full years?
Was it just a passing
coincidence that Iran's invasion and claim of ownership of Iraqi territory took
place less than 48 hours after a U.S. assistant secretary of state provided the
Safavis a “verdict of innocence” regarding
Iran's obvious role in Yemen's Houthi
plot?
Posted by
WORLDMEETS.US
[Editor's Note: The author
refers to a militant Shiite movement in North Yemen, which many suspect is being funded
and encouraged by Tehran. In the South, the Southern Movement is agitating for succession, and there are suspicions that it, too, is being backed by Iran].
The masks are now off of both
new and old occupations. Lost in the chaos is the lie of “sovereignty” that
Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki, and other occupation puppets of his ilk, like to
brag about; the same can be said for the ridiculous praise for what used to be
called “the sisterly Islamic Republic of Iran.” Honorable Iraqis remember the
late Abdul Aziz Al-Hakim's
call for Iraq to pay his Persian masters $1 trillion as compensation for Tehran's oppressive war on Iraq
between 1980-1988. [Until he died in August, Al-Hakim was the leader of Iraq's
largest party, the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq]. Anyone with open eyes can
see that the hostility of Persians is aimed at Islam, Pan-Arabism and all
Iraqis - not the regime of Saddam Hussein, as claimed by the trumpeting Mullahs,
who have deafened the ears of the people for 30 years.
The arrogance of
this aggression wasn't even worth a reply from the Green Zone's duel-occupation
collaborators. At least they could have recalled their ambassador from Tehran
or expelled the Iranian ambassador from Iraq!! Adding to the suspicion is that after
every recent bombing in Iraq, they [Iraqi leaders] were called “courageous,” for
rushing to accuse Arabs in general and Syria in particular - although Iraqi
officials are fully-aware of the alliance between Damascus and Tehran!!
Have the ayatollahs of Qom [Iran's
mullahs] given up their ties to their reliable partners in the Assad regime,
the Arab Levant in general
and in particular, Syria and even more importantly, Lebanon? Or is Tehran controlling
Damascus as it controls Maliki, Moqtada al-Sadr and Ibrahim al-Jaafari, distributing
roles and missions to everyone, even if it is insulting to one or the other? Or
is the Syrian regime about to abandon its very expensive relationship with the Safavids,
so therefore, Iran's agents in Iraq were instructed to insult Syria on behalf of
Tehran?